From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26D8EB64DA for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232464AbjGGKG3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2023 06:06:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37978 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230445AbjGGKG0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2023 06:06:26 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3596490 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 03:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1688724339; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/vnTtSiKOMjZxc3jeLfaWbRQvAX9nav0kROrltspdlg=; b=OislU4hPXIzqlJjyzIBjTT+9YA2Uh0bHf0NEJF6eEB+e3EMJCpuQ9ewdbZ2t5xjv0p1LKf QmKGH/OvEZsYHFX9R4iXoB3FyIhxy/CuryzfTQ+D4ViWk2doR+w0/E1zdweZ7KiWCYfy2H Dq85lP+GNTZVAbY/4spYE8pta5Vip0w= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-369-nkilttf3NEmvbKGKMz3idg-1; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 06:05:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nkilttf3NEmvbKGKMz3idg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE2D887102; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-8-34.pek2.redhat.com (ovpn-8-18.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496862166B25; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 18:05:24 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: chengming.zhou@linux.dev Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, tj@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhouchengming@bytedance.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] blk-mq: delete unused completion_data in struct request Message-ID: References: <20230707093722.1338589-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> <20230707093722.1338589-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230707093722.1338589-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 05:37:19PM +0800, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote: > From: Chengming Zhou > > After global search, I found "completion_data" in struct request > is not used anywhere, so just clean it up by the way. > > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Thanks, Ming