From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5221CEB64DD for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 03:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230002AbjGXDsQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jul 2023 23:48:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230233AbjGXDsG (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jul 2023 23:48:06 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96CF7DD for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:48:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=rD2o03oywrQbl03nygg5NeYhEzEaqLbdSS7VHYFYy9w=; b=LfM3ELlrfQ44a5QhE4f8IlLt4J pqhy94V9ujXzJO0JWGNlp5zfCtXFBJ9LiZ18EudChMCbDbe5nkHDXLSZPFvUxtrNzYXiql0lz2abW juQHJ+qZCJGrxzjxANsYvrf0Dw9tr8odFnYLJf2JB9hN+WWOOGZV41VhTm7HIr8hjchcrfstkBjYr H3hMr6QW5fu0m6DOpnzFQ6k/nHyW65lEqps2Y3WRVHX7odGb3JiBDBAClo2elqw+kz+aK46uzpAYg 0aIGeqmdUMr0bJD5kNMCr0NCKqULbf/jhR/JBMwz7aJwQOE79LjFbIAizyXnnl5T/+Js9GaGb7ysI 39mBamkg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qNmXl-003x0r-9s; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 03:47:33 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 04:47:33 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Linke Li Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, trix@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, Linke Li Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hugetlbfs: Fix integer overflow check in hugetlbfs_file_mmap() Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:49:52PM +0800, Linke Li wrote: > +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c > @@ -154,10 +154,7 @@ static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma) > if (vma->vm_pgoff & (~huge_page_mask(h) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) > return -EINVAL; > > - vma_len = (loff_t)(vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start); > - len = vma_len + ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT); > - /* check for overflow */ > - if (len < vma_len) > + if (check_add_overflow(vma_len, (loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT, &len)) > return -EINVAL; Doesn't this check duplicate that performed by file_mmap_ok()? Can't we just delete the check, or is there a code path that leads here while avoiding file_mmap_ok()?