From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, pcc@google.com,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
yury.norov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eugenis@google.com,
syednwaris@gmail.com, william.gray@linaro.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] lib/bitmap: add bitmap_{set,get}_value()
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:29:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLVQOF0F4OfZQ8Qt@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=XNYQC8gKKQr3Mz7CVw8H=Ubmr+QaUu-jraoT4sN550rA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:14:57PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
+Cc: Nathan (on code generation question below)
...
> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > You can use --cc to `git send-email` instead of polluting the commit message.
>
> Right. But as far as I can tell, certain kernel devs prefer to be CCed
> on the whole series, whereas others do not want to see anything but
> the actual patch they were interested in.
> I am not sure about Arnd's preferences, so I just decided to keep the
> tag from the original patch by Syed Nayyar Waris (which I also
> consider to be an indication of the fact "that potentially interested
> parties have been included in the discussion" per
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by)
My personal statistics from the field that more than 90% of maintainers would
like to receive 100% of the series. Of course it depends on the series (if it's
treewide, I will agree with you). Here another point to my suggestion is that
Arnd is SoC tree maintainer, where ARM is one of the biggest player, so I think
he would like to see arm*: prefixed patches anyway.
...
> > > + map[index] &= ~(GENMASK(nbits + offset - 1, offset));
> >
> > I remember that this construction may bring horrible code on some architectures
> > with some version(s) of the compiler (*).
>
> Wow, even the trunk Clang and GCC seem to generate better code for
> your version of this line: https://godbolt.org/z/36Kqxhe6j
Wow, indeed! Perhaps time to report to clang and GCC people. I believe the root
cause is that in the original version compiler can't prove that l is constant
for GENMASK().
> > To fix that I found an easy refactoring:
> >
> > map[index] &= ~(GENMASK(nbits, 0) << offset));
>
> I'll take this one.
>
> > (*) don't remember the actual versions, though, but anyway...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-17 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 11:37 [PATCH v3 0/5] Implement MTE tag compression for swapped pages Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] lib/bitmap: add bitmap_{set,get}_value() Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 13:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-17 14:14 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 14:29 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-07-17 14:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-17 16:15 ` Yury Norov
2023-07-17 14:53 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 15:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-17 16:29 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 15:50 ` Yury Norov
2023-07-18 9:30 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-18 14:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-18 17:03 ` Yury Norov
2023-07-18 17:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-19 9:00 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_{set,get}_value() Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 13:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-18 10:19 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 16:11 ` Yury Norov
2023-07-17 16:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-17 16:42 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: mte: implement CONFIG_ARM64_MTE_COMP Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-18 15:33 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-18 17:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-19 12:16 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-19 6:09 ` Yury Norov
2023-07-19 14:00 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-19 21:06 ` Yury Norov
2023-07-20 12:00 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-19 20:32 ` Evgenii Stepanov
2023-07-17 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: mte: add a test for MTE tags compression Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: mte: add compression support to mteswap.c Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-17 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-18 10:48 ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-07-18 14:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLVQOF0F4OfZQ8Qt@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=syednwaris@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=william.gray@linaro.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome