From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E079C6FA8F for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237109AbjH2Pcp (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:32:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35188 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232006AbjH2PcS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:32:18 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769D499 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1693323136; x=1724859136; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0n+m++KPN1r3Yvn7PDKqakNtL34RTBQf7rUiOj2lj0A=; b=lsDdO/+Ft0Tu+jotrezow4zOvuCGkKfUz9JQKlld7ZBM2PaDdkfQHdTd VMjNRBA+AlZOzx2PGIf1LdE8d01fsIzLx8YFjXKVZWmxlEezHbvsv7S2g yoA3PApHYLbDwJeaSxR1sBrHegGlVdTum/7WsZiFpdaNuzKOphK9Ezkfk gjgV2/VB0LoI07EElzIH/rubUQTWJmc09PMkK+OogYNMOI+SLP9H0H/vY zfL5f862aBobg77DR4omJvwL4bfbTSTjydpK/DJ0e8W0ODjz0OphItgLw 2iq19dKzxnclxZM1+K2dZFcxl6dXZ4TUY9lwXudjSHbTvqeE6RnBWLSAS g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10817"; a="365607520" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,210,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="365607520" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2023 08:32:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10817"; a="773728259" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,210,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="773728259" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2023 08:32:14 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qb0hR-004upn-1d; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:32:13 +0300 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:32:13 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Yury Norov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] bitmap: replace _reg_op(REG_OP_RELEASE) with bitmap_clear() Message-ID: References: <20230829023911.64335-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> <20230829023911.64335-6-yury.norov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230829023911.64335-6-yury.norov@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 07:39:08PM -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > _reg_op(REG_OP_RELEASE) duplicates bitmap_clear(). ... > - __reg_op(bitmap, pos, order, REG_OP_RELEASE); > + bitmap_clear(bitmap, pos, pos + BIT(order)); Is it still buggy? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko