Re: [REGRESSION] HDMI connector detection broken in 6.3 on Intel(R) Celeron(R) N3060 integrated graphics

[Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>]

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:12:46AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Aug 2023, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 03:41:30PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> On 11.08.23 20:10, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> > >> > On 2023-08-11 at 08:45 +02, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> > >> >> On 10.08.23 21:33, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> > >> >>> The following is a copy an issue I posted to drm/i915 gitlab [1] two
> > >> >>> months ago. I repost it to the mailing lists in hope that it will help
> > >> >>> the right people pay attention to it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thx for your report. Wonder why Dmitry (who authored a4e771729a51) or
> > >> >> Thomas (who committed it) it didn't look into this, but maybe the i915
> > >> >> devs didn't forward the report to them.
> > >> 
> > >> For the record: they did, and Jani mentioned already. Sorry, should have
> > >> phrased this differently.
> > >> 
> > >> >> Let's see if these mails help. Just wondering: does reverting
> > >> >> a4e771729a51 from 6.5-rc5 or drm-tip help as well?
> > >> > 
> > >> > I've redone my tests with 6.5-rc5, and here are the results:
> > >> > (1) 6.5-rc5 -> still affected
> > >> > (2) 6.5-rc5 + revert a4e771729a51 -> not affected
> > >> > (3) 6.5-rc5 + two patches [1][2] suggested on i915 gitlab by @ideak -> not affected (!)
> > >> > 
> > >> > Should we somehow tell regzbot about (3)?
> > >> 
> > >> That's good to know, thx. But the more important things are:
> > >> 
> > >> * When will those be merged? They are not yet in next yet afaics, so it
> > >> might take some time to mainline them, especially at this point of the
> > >> devel cycle. Imre, could you try to prod the right people so that these
> > >> are ideally upstreamed rather sooner than later, as they fix a regression?
> > >
> > > I think the patches ([1] and [2]) could be merged via the drm-intel-next
> > > (drm-intel-fixes) tree Cc'ing also stable. Jani, is this ok?
> > 
> > It's fine by me, but need drm-misc maintainer ack to merge [1] via
> > drm-intel.
> 
> That's fine for me

Thanks, I pushed the patches to drm-intel-next.

> Maxime