From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD47C83F16 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232073AbjHZIpu (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:45:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232059AbjHZIpa (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:45:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4E5213A; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2b9c907bc68so24365781fa.2; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:45:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693039525; x=1693644325; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=HBPeLGUAtVO0USbU1Yk7uoBTmd4OjEFwwRL+82RfIoU=; b=I+hNkSebw7bIjmSdswc4ETvWrfjQhIqqY+AzDHmp9zFCeMNWaVgsoY8i/SRQOvrGuV b3JnxqtDDyzX2Kt1PThI2M905f+tlLAY0nyXfocWLTW/OEDyW9R8OXLDjOHpNv7g+ewS DAypWh0w7Q/Z0Jbn/x65RVdMo+UHYQpplrP8u7k+iEjxRxHnNuyuWmXJLl0zdyrte9Ed q48hqzmZCvbqXi2nSNObFJjihjdATpkFNl77hVfruJ2tTYjItUzggpQ0lNXVoBjZ4h0u nUrfd2YP9SS84IuSp/IaK2ZSGFPf1dAOwCcnkGEEGhAg5iLIge4tAkaWXELqT/l+vXvW uLdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693039525; x=1693644325; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HBPeLGUAtVO0USbU1Yk7uoBTmd4OjEFwwRL+82RfIoU=; b=RjAUtFScX72dp7k9Tr0QodLmM2oYXJAK0dylkQd6tuX+11bDxBPR5QFYoqizR0KYQx 3rh44+nM2jCyQ4sNF0kv/B+23DwHB+114dG1xp82FqEeDnNVmx6Q7wq0CWtphnatabNS ps94fhShCY/igKoD/qmNs91UMrer9n9AteyJU/uih7f/VnncB40o+z+ovoOMxz+ib/xF bBCdHRc66uJKEz3s2/1nGBWmDaWNDlhXT+igsSDJz1IW3xUm3wnL34S2X3CAGrEj5+nE o7v+jej/kPSNTbEkiqFV7CB9itqq92U/6JAuMU08Kq6pereWXG9Rju0GZjOdOr6Ok3gF YQGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxN5Sde4Rz4owYHkeZURzsPYMJ+yAACdRbEBvKHzwhItBm3Fpgm YI2cvrA81ILHYW83bj3yZNw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHJ5zcjFrIN0QeJxxkD/ZHmLjGuxoaGhiieRGHGeCha2xLp4jN/svXjDeyG9xlQkN75QRRrZg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e09:0:b0:2b6:dac0:affe with SMTP id e9-20020a2e9e09000000b002b6dac0affemr15375800ljk.31.1693039525121; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eldamar.lan (c-82-192-242-114.customer.ggaweb.ch. [82.192.242.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y24-20020a1c4b18000000b003fc01189b0dsm4306875wma.42.2023.08.26.01.45.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 01:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Salvatore Bonaccorso Received: by eldamar.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5A50BE2DE0; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:45:22 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/15] 6.1.48-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230824141447.155846739@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:26:59AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:14:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release. > > There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Build test (gcc version 12.3.1 20230625): > mips: 52 configs -> no failure > arm: 100 configs -> no failure > arm64: 3 configs -> no failure > x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure > alpha allmodconfig -> no failure > csky allmodconfig -> no failure > powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure > riscv allmodconfig -> no failure > s390 allmodconfig -> no failure > xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure > > Boot test: > x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. Warning on boot. > x86_64: Booted on qemu. Warning on boot. [1] > arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] > mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] > > [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4787 > [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4796 > [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4795 > > Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee > > > [ 0.154501] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.154505] missing return thunk: __alt_instructions_end+0x21b2/0x21d0-srso_untrain_ret+0x0/0x2: e9 17 81 f8 fe > [ 0.154517] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:572 apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200 > [ 0.154524] Modules linked in: > [ 0.154526] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.48-rc1-c079d0dd788a+ #1 > [ 0.154529] Hardware name: LENOVO 4287CTO/4287CTO, BIOS 8DET68WW (1.38 ) 04/11/2013 > [ 0.154531] RIP: 0010:apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200 > [ 0.154534] Code: 5b 01 00 0f 85 0b ff ff ff 49 89 e8 b9 05 00 00 00 4c 89 f2 48 89 ee 48 c7 c7 38 16 4f b8 c6 05 f5 d1 5b 01 01 e8 85 8e 05 00 <0f> 0b e9 e3 fe ff ff c7 84 24 81 00 00 00 cc cc cc cc 42 c7 44 38 > [ 0.154536] RSP: 0000:ffffffffb8803e30 EFLAGS: 00010282 > [ 0.154539] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffb906d7b4 RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 0.154541] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000004ffb RDI: 00000000ffffffff > [ 0.154542] RBP: ffffffffb9079962 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffefff > [ 0.154544] R10: ffffffffb8803cc0 R11: ffffffffb88cc1e8 R12: ffffffffb906d7d4 > [ 0.154545] R13: cccccccccccccccc R14: ffffffffb8001a7e R15: 0000000000000004 > [ 0.154547] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff936dd6200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 0.154549] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 0.154551] CR2: ffff936dde5ff000 CR3: 000000013b40a001 CR4: 00000000000606f0 > [ 0.154553] Call Trace: > [ 0.154556] > [ 0.154559] ? __warn+0x79/0xc0 > [ 0.154565] ? apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200 > [ 0.154567] ? report_bug+0xee/0x170 > [ 0.154572] ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20 > [ 0.154578] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70 > [ 0.154581] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 > [ 0.154583] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 > [ 0.154586] ? retbleed_return_thunk+0x7e/0x7e > [ 0.154591] ? apply_returns+0x1cb/0x200 > [ 0.154594] ? apply_retpolines+0x1f5/0x2c0 > [ 0.154598] alternative_instructions+0x4d/0xfc > [ 0.154604] arch_cpu_finalize_init+0x28/0x47 > [ 0.154607] start_kernel+0x66c/0x70e > [ 0.154612] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xce/0xdb > [ 0.154618] > [ 0.154619] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Seeing this as well, but see some context in the thread in the previous cycle (where then those patches were not included); https://lore.kernel.org/stable/2023082212-pregnant-lizard-80e0@gregkh/ Apart for the above regression, no other regressions spotted. Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso Regards, Salvatore