From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCD4EE7FF9 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243450AbjIHNpn (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 09:45:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241760AbjIHNpl (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 09:45:41 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de (elvis.franken.de [193.175.24.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2231BF4; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 06:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1qebnV-0005jo-00; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 15:45:21 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32113C0508; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 15:41:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 15:41:23 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Randy Dunlap , manuel.lauss@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: only build mmc support helpers if au1xmmc is enabled Message-ID: References: <20230905070656.196274-1-hch@lst.de> <20230908081634.GC8240@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230908081634.GC8240@lst.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 10:16:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 06:04:18PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > > Tested-by: Randy Dunlap # build-tested > > Thomas, given that this is mips arch code, it's probably best if you > pick it up. sure, will apply it soon. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]