From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 18:24:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRr8r7XMoyDKaitd@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002094526.1.Ie8f760213053e3d11592f892b30912dbac6b8b48@changeid>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 09:45:29AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Some mediatek devices have the property
> "mediatek,broken-save-restore-fw" in their GIC. This means that,
> although the hardware supports pseudo-NMI, the firmware has a bug
> that blocks enabling it. When we're in this state,
> system_uses_irq_prio_masking() will return true but we'll fail to
> actually enable the IRQ in the GIC.
>
> Let's make the code handle this. We'll detect that we failed to
> request an IPI as NMI and fallback to requesting it normally. Though
> we expect that either all of our requests will fail or all will
> succeed, it's just as cheap to keep a per-IPI bitmap and that keeps us
> robust.
>
> Fixes: 331a1b3a836c ("arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI")
> Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> Closes: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/197061987#comment68
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
I'm not too keen on falling back here when we have no idea why the request failed.
I'd prefer if we could check the `supports_pseudo_nmis` static key directly to
account for the case of broken FW, e.g. as below.
Mark.
---->8----
From 72fdec05c64a74f21871b44c7c760bbe07cac044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 18:00:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: smp: avoid NMI IPIs with broken MediaTek FW
Some MediaTek devices have broken firmware which corrupts some GICR
registers behind the back of the OS, and pseudo-NMIs cannot be used on
these devices. For more details see commit:
44bd78dd2b8897f5 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Disable pseudo NMIs on Mediatek devices w/ firmware issues")
We did not take this problem into account in commit:
331a1b3a836c0f38 ("arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI")
Since that commit arm64's SMP code will try to setup some IPIs as
pseudo-NMIs, even on systems with broken FW. The GICv3 code will
(rightly) reject attempts to request interrupts as pseudo-NMIs,
resulting in boot-time failures.
Avoid the problem by taking the broken FW into account when deciding to
request IPIs as pseudo-NMIs. The GICv3 driver maintains a static_key
named "supports_pseudo_nmis" which is false on systems with broken FW,
and we can consult this within ipi_should_be_nmi().
Fixes: 331a1b3a836c0f38 ("arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI")
Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Closes: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/197061987#comment68
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 5 ++++-
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 814d9aa93b21b..061c69160f90f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -964,7 +964,10 @@ static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr)
static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
{
- if (!system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
+ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(supports_pseudo_nmis);
+
+ if (!system_uses_irq_prio_masking() ||
+ !static_branch_likely(&supports_pseudo_nmis))
return false;
switch (ipi) {
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 787ccc880b22d..737da1b9aabf2 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
* - Figure 4-7 Secure read of the priority field for a Non-secure Group 1
* interrupt.
*/
-static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(supports_pseudo_nmis);
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(supports_pseudo_nmis);
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-02 16:45 Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: smp: Don't directly call arch_smp_send_reschedule() for wakeup Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 17:24 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-10-02 19:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 12:29 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 13:43 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 16:32 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 19:32 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-04 9:59 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-04 10:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-04 14:04 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-05 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-05 15:34 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06 12:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-06 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 22:17 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06 9:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 10:20 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRr8r7XMoyDKaitd@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®