From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Joey Jiao <quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Add CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE option
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 12:20:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSb1Z6EcogoUYcOR@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011074438.6098-1-quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 01:14:38PM +0530, Joey Jiao wrote:
> When modprobe cmds are executed one by one, the final loaded modules
> are not in fixed sequence as expected.
>
> Add the option to make sure modules are in fixed sequence across reboot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joey Jiao <quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com>
> ---
> kernel/module/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> kernel/module/main.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module/Kconfig b/kernel/module/Kconfig
> index 33a2e991f608..b45a45f31d6d 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/module/Kconfig
> @@ -389,4 +389,15 @@ config MODULES_TREE_LOOKUP
> def_bool y
> depends on PERF_EVENTS || TRACING || CFI_CLANG
>
> +config MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE
> + bool "Load module in sequence"
> + default n
> + help
> + By default, modules are loaded in random sequence depending on when modprobe
> + is executed.
> +
> + This option allows modules to be loaded in sequence if modprobe cmds are
> + executed one by one in sequence. This option is helpful during syzkaller fuzzing
> + to make sure module is loaded into fixed address across device reboot.
> +
> endif # MODULES
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 98fedfdb8db5..e238a31d09eb 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -2594,7 +2594,8 @@ static noinline int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
> * rcu_barrier()
> */
> if (llist_add(&freeinit->node, &init_free_list))
> - schedule_work(&init_free_wq);
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE)) {
> + schedule_work(&init_free_wq);
>
As Christoph suggested the rationale for something like this needs to be
clearly spelled out in the commit log and if so valuable it should be
a default. The commit log and even the Kconfig description do little
to justify any rationale for this.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 7:44 Joey Jiao
2023-10-11 11:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-11 19:20 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2023-10-12 18:24 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-12 18:35 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSb1Z6EcogoUYcOR@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®