mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] fs/proc/page: use a folio in stable_page_flags()
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:50:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZU6lmvMpSfKjjYB3@memverge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110033324.2455523-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:33:19AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Replace nine compound_head() calls with one page_folio().
>

Sorry to echo Matthew, but this commit message is extremely
insufficient and just outright wrong.

Single pass through, here's the real change list:

1) changes PageFLAG() calls to folio_test_FLAG calls
2) changes compound_head() flag checks to folio_test_FLAG checks
3) change page count to folio ref count
   -- without even looking... is this even correct? Need more
      explanation here. Is page count === folio ref count?

So there are really 3 changes in this patch set that should be broken
out separately, even if they all depend on folio flags, because they
need separate explanation and validation for correctness.

> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/page.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-10 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-10  3:33 [PATCH v2 0/7] mm: remove page idle and young wrapper Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] fs/proc/page: remove unneeded PageTail && PageSlab check Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 18:11   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] fs/proc/page: use a folio in stable_page_flags() Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 18:15   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-11  3:21     ` Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 21:50   ` Gregory Price [this message]
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] fs/proc/page: respect folio head-page flag placement Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 18:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-11  9:49     ` Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm: huge_memory: use more folio api in __split_huge_page_tail() Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 18:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-11 10:00     ` Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: task_mmu: use a folio in smaps_account() Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 18:29   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-11 10:57     ` Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: task_mmu: use a folio in clear_refs_pte_range() Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10  3:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] page_idle: kill page idle and young wrapper Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZU6lmvMpSfKjjYB3@memverge.com \
    --to=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®