Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/187] 5.10.202-rc3 review

[Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.202 release.
> There are 187 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

> Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>     gpio: Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as immutable

This is attempt to move people to new API, which will cause warning
for existing users. "chip_warn(gc, "not an immutable chip, please
consider fixing it!\n");". It is marked as dependency of another
patch, but I'm not sure we should be doing this in stable.

> youwan Wang <wangyouwan@126.com>
>     Bluetooth: btusb: Add date->evt_skb is NULL check

Could someone double check this? If we hit the null check, we'll be
returning success, but it sounds like an error case.

> Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>     drm/msm/dp: skip validity check for DP CTS EDID checksum

This is preparation for future cleanup, do we need it?

> Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
>     ASoC: soc-card: Add storage for PCI SSID

This adds infrastructure for white/blacklisting, but I don't see an
user of that in 5.10 (or 6.1).

> Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>     media: cobalt: Use FIELD_GET() to extract Link Width

Cleanup, but not a bugfix.

> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
>     SUNRPC: Add an IS_ERR() check back to where it was

According to changelog, this is only needed with commit 25cf32ad5dba
("SUNRPC: Handle allocation failure in rpc_new_task()") in tree, and
we don't have that in 5.10.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]