From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: use a mutex to protect the list of GPIO devices
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:08:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWYQmpe7UxnJW0_g@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231127193716.63143-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 08:37:16PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> The global list of GPIO devices is never modified or accessed from
> atomic context so it's fine to protect it using a mutex. Add a new
> global lock dedicated to the gpio_devices list and use it whenever
> accessing or modifying it.
>
> While at it: fold the sysfs registering of existing devices into
> gpiolib.c and make gpio_devices static within its compilation unit.
...
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &gpio_devices_lock) {
This is a lot of churn with this because of switching to RAII.
Can the body be firstly moved to a helper?
> + /*
> + * TODO: this allocates a Linux GPIO number base in the global
> + * GPIO numberspace for this chip. In the long run we want to
> + * get *rid* of this numberspace and use only descriptors, but
> + * it may be a pipe dream. It will not happen before we get rid
> + * of the sysfs interface anyways.
> + */
...
> list_for_each_entry(gdev, &gpio_devices, list)
> + if (index-- == 0)
> return gdev;
I believe this is better with outer {}.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 19:37 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: sysfs: fix forward declaration of struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-11-27 19:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: use a mutex to protect the list of GPIO devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-11-28 14:21 ` Linus Walleij
2023-11-28 14:52 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-11-28 15:05 ` Linus Walleij
2023-11-28 16:08 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-11-28 16:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-11-28 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: sysfs: fix forward declaration of struct gpio_device Linus Walleij
2023-11-28 16:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-28 16:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWYQmpe7UxnJW0_g@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®