mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-edac@vkeg.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Get microcode revision from cpu_data instead of boot_cpu_data
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:58:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWos70EKhlAl2VPb@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231201112327.42319-1-sironi@amazon.de>

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:23:27AM +0000, Filippo Sironi wrote:
> Commit fa94d0c6e0f3 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check
> records") extended MCE entries to report the microcode revision taken
> from boot_cpu_data. Unfortunately, boot_cpu_data isn't updated on late
> microcode loading, thus making MCE entries slightly incorrect.  Use

This code in intel.c:apply_microcode_late() looks like it tries to update
boot_cpu_data:

466         cpu_data(cpu).microcode  = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
467         if (!cpu)
468                 boot_cpu_data.microcode = uci->cpu_sig.rev;

Is that not working for some reason?

> cpu_data instead, which is updated on late microcode loading. This also
> fixes the corner case in which the microcode revision isn't coherent
> across CPUs (which may happen on late microcode loading failure).

But this does seem a worthwhile change to help diagnose things if late
load is somehow only applied to some subset of CPUs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> index 7b397370b4d6..e1b033298db0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void mce_setup(struct mce *m)
>  	m->apicid = cpu_data(m->extcpu).topo.initial_apicid;
>  	m->mcgcap = __rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP);
>  	m->ppin = cpu_data(m->extcpu).ppin;
> -	m->microcode = boot_cpu_data.microcode;
> +	m->microcode = cpu_data(m->extcpu).microcode;
>  }
>  
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mce, injectm);
> -- 
> 2.33.0

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-01 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-01 11:23 Filippo Sironi
2023-12-01 18:58 ` Tony Luck [this message]
2023-12-01 19:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-01 19:56   ` Sironi, Filippo
2023-12-06 21:04     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-07  9:34       ` Sironi, Filippo
2023-12-01 18:59 ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWos70EKhlAl2VPb@agluck-desk3 \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vkeg.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sironi@amazon.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®