Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch to generalized quirk table

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:44:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:11:13PM +0100, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:

...

> > +static const struct pci_device_id quirk_ids[] = {
> >  	/* Microsoft Surface Go (version 1) I2C4 */
> > -	{ PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1182), },
> > +	{ PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1182),
> > +		.driver_data = QUIRK_IGNORE_RESOURCE_CONFLICTS },
> >  	/* Microsoft Surface Go 2 I2C4 */
> > -	{ PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1237), },
> > +	{ PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1237),
> > +		.driver_data = QUIRK_IGNORE_RESOURCE_CONFLICTS },
> >  	{ }
> >  };
> 
> I would suggest to look at the existing style, as I also in doubts on the
> above. Perhaps the following is more common in MFD subsystem?
> 
> 	{
> 		PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x9d64, 0x152d, 0x1237),
> 		.driver_data = QUIRK_IGNORE_RESOURCE_CONFLICTS

Ah, and in this form we usually leave trailing comma as we don't know
the future (possible, but quite unlikely, new fields in the structure).

> 	},

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko