From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: "Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)" <maheshb@google.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Don Hatchett <hatch@google.com>,
Yuliang Li <yuliangli@google.com>,
Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@bandewar.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 2/3] ptp: add ioctl interface for ptp_gettimex64any()
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:07:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZsSqXLjVG16Q7EL@hoboy.vegasvil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF2d9jhnsubL-sw792ZviSXrFB826G-U8OktdEMN1NCe5zuj0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 12:08:57AM -0800, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> Having a general solution for posix timers is a nice addition.
> However, expecting a general purpose syscall to eliminate need for
> device ioctl is an unreasonable expectation.
Let me make this clear:
There is no reasonable justification for a new PTP ioctl.
The system call can and should use the the most accurate method
internally to the kernel.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-07 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 21:24 Mahesh Bandewar
2024-01-04 22:37 ` Richard Cochran
2024-01-05 17:51 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
2024-01-06 4:55 ` Richard Cochran
2024-01-06 5:03 ` Richard Cochran
2024-01-06 8:08 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
2024-01-07 21:07 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2024-01-07 21:13 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZsSqXLjVG16Q7EL@hoboy.vegasvil.org \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hatch@google.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@bandewar.net \
--cc=maheshb@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yuliangli@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®