From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18BA423E325 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 18:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744136953; cv=none; b=lohcOC2qZ6BQTrPkY1f2E1FXERDsFIlbA4C0OiB4BSR+NXpUEeaTCa+7xWv2SufZb6pnqU6j9sox/C4ci/nC6eKgKwvk85qdAP/F1Qy+Pk7SEZgfbErM9TNE7T9AEUeYPXWYx2aX8lFwrf9XbuCCDLKxBahzg+hNFxemAxw+oio= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744136953; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8D+MSSObsvj9zna1p0kHSg3KtREFa9e2SljukZPEjpg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=p/RDsS42Re10q/lhoyZhyKj/hCmjAqBMZe8SH7ik/slP9RG6N8ikvF5ngxaoDhdpDkIWA34bewboC/bP6Wnp+0DcA/ZF9ByThjC+lN/KXD0h5hBjjj11aNQiwaGGbXg1UfaM0Eh+3TnTjEX4V1D2ETI+cGFWXgIEHk4gkf4nelo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nI06J89S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nI06J89S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B192C4CEE5; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 18:29:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744136952; bh=8D+MSSObsvj9zna1p0kHSg3KtREFa9e2SljukZPEjpg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nI06J89SkrZv7TSf7gRs4LjM+X8H1e+uP0rgnoL48PQrxo+/dSEinFqzxVfin/dDU gCrcnx0jQ83avt/cKMtm7xvhRLE7H0lge7lEQwlFxVOEX0hytTXyxzHaiD8XWeUdQx KV5qX68+/MJETpBH0phPXRhxarNLyqEDGRkmUCbBxB1Q20hkHsksPf3aHDTfpXuCk2 F0L5ZsykExjUkUyX65C/zSBsxNORieJLjJdz45vEy2i08snfdZKi4RbBvsVMvT5GMT fABj11rYMGXp389KJl+2GtBm4oqia1zPlOP6iaHP35g+dOOntHm7iuZ7D9aeWuBy9u 1jZ3mOHR8+a+w== Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:29:11 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Andrea Righi Cc: David Vernet , Changwoo Min , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.15-fixes] sched_ext: Mark SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT for deprecation Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:28:18PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:12:57AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > > SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT was only used to suppress the missing cgroup > > weight support warnings. Now that the warnings are removed, the flag doesn't > > do anything. Mark it for deprecation and remove its usage from scx_flatcg. > > Is the removal from scx_flatcg meant to be part of this patch, or is it > intended as a follow-up? Other than that LGTM. Oh, sorry about that. Lemme send v2. Thanks. -- tejun