From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Harshit Agarwal <harshit@nutanix.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: Fix race in push_dl_task
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:32:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_YGW8IrRQfhfdM8@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408045021.3283624-1-harshit@nutanix.com>
Hello,
On 08/04/25 04:50, Harshit Agarwal wrote:
> When a CPU chooses to call push_dl_task and picks a task to push to
> another CPU's runqueue then it will call find_lock_later_rq method
> which would take a double lock on both CPUs' runqueues. If one of the
> locks aren't readily available, it may lead to dropping the current
> runqueue lock and reacquiring both the locks at once. During this window
> it is possible that the task is already migrated and is running on some
> other CPU. These cases are already handled. However, if the task is
> migrated and has already been executed and another CPU is now trying to
> wake it up (ttwu) such that it is queued again on the runqeue
> (on_rq is 1) and also if the task was run by the same CPU, then the
> current checks will pass even though the task was migrated out and is no
> longer in the pushable tasks list.
> Please go through the original rt change for more details on the issue.
>
> To fix this, after the lock is obtained inside the find_lock_later_rq,
> it ensures that the task is still at the head of pushable tasks list.
> Also removed some checks that are no longer needed with the addition of
> this new check.
> However, the new check of pushable tasks list only applies when
> find_lock_later_rq is called by push_dl_task. For the other caller i.e.
> dl_task_offline_migration, existing checks are used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Agarwal <harshit@nutanix.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
The new version looks good to me.
Some final minor touches to changelog/comment might still be required,
but Peter maybe you can do it if/when picking up the change?
Anyway,
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 4:50 Harshit Agarwal
2025-04-09 5:32 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2025-08-07 20:17 ` Harshit Agarwal
2025-09-03 8:05 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/deadline: Fix race in push_dl_task() tip-bot2 for Harshit Agarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_YGW8IrRQfhfdM8@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=harshit@nutanix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®