mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:29:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaVrZWGgmBNbsNba@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115112359.65dcecbf@rorschach.local.home>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:23:59AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:09:38 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > No. The ring buffer logic should not care if the user of it is swapping
> > the entire ring buffer or not. It only cares if parts of the ring
> > buffer is being swapped or not. That's not the level of scope it should
> > care about. If we do not want a swap to happen in update_max_tr()
> > that's not ring_buffer.c's problem. The code to prevent that from
> > happening should be 100% in trace.c.
> 
> What needs to be done, and feel free to add this as a separate patch,
> is to have checks where snapshot is used.
> 
>   (All errors return -EBUSY)
> 
> Before allowing mapping, check to see if:
> 
>  1) the current tracer has "use_max_tr" set.
>  2) any event has a "snapshot" trigger set
>  3) Any function has a "snapshot" command set

Could we sum-up this with a single check to allocate_snapshot? If that is
allocated it's probably because we'll be using it?

That would simply add the requirement to echo 0 > snapshot before starting the
memory map?

The opposite could be to let tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance() fail whenever a
mapping is in place?

> 
> Fail if any of the above is true.
> 
> Also in reverse, if the buffer is mapped, then fail:
> 
>  1) a tracer being set that has "use_max_tr" set.
>  2) a "snapshot" command being set on a function
>  3) a "snapshot" trigger being set on an event.
> 
> For the last two, we may be able to get away with just a below as well.
> Adding the tr->flags bit. We could also add a tr->snapshot count to
> keep track of everything that is using a snapshot, and if that count is
> non-zero, mapping fails.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 2a7c6fd934e9..f534f74ae80f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,12 @@ static void tracing_snapshot_instance_cond(struct trace_array *tr,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_MAPPED) {
> +		trace_array_puts(tr, "*** BUFFER IS MEMORY MAPPED ***\n");
> +		trace_array_puts(tr, "*** Can not use snapshot (sorry) ***\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  	update_max_tr(tr, current, smp_processor_id(), cond_data);
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
> 
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-15 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-11 16:17 [PATCH v11 0/5] Introducing trace buffer mapping by user-space Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] ring-buffer: Zero ring-buffer sub-buffers Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-13 13:38   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-11 16:34   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-11 23:23     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-12  9:13       ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-12 15:06         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-12 15:58           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15  4:43   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-15 15:37     ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-15 16:09       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 16:23         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 17:29           ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2024-01-15 18:03             ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 23:48           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] tracing: Allow user-space mapping of the ring-buffer Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] Documentation: tracing: Add ring-buffer mapping Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-13 13:36   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 14:26   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 16:23     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-14 23:10       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] ring-buffer/selftest: Add ring-buffer mapping test Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-13 13:39   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 14:17     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 16:20       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZaVrZWGgmBNbsNba@google.com \
    --to=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®