Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spinlock: Fix failing build for PREEMPT_RT

[Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 04:32:32AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Since 1d71b30e1f85 ("sched.h: Move (spin|rwlock)_needbreak() to
> spinlock.h") build fails for PREEMPT_RT, since there is no definition
> available of either spin_needbreak() and rwlock_needbreak().
> 
> Since it was moved on the mentioned commit, it was placed inside a
> !PREEMPT_RT part of the code, making it out of reach for an RT kernel.
> 
> Fix this by moving code it a few lines down so it can be reached by an
> RT build, where it can also make use of the *_is_contended() definition
> added by the spinlock_rt.h.
> 
> Fixes: d1d71b30e1f85 ("sched.h: Move (spin|rwlock)_needbreak() to
> spinlock.h")
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/spinlock.h | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
> index eaac8b0da25b8..3fcd20de6ca88 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
> @@ -449,6 +449,12 @@ static __always_inline int spin_is_contended(spinlock_t *lock)
>  	return raw_spin_is_contended(&lock->rlock);
>  }
>  
> +#define assert_spin_locked(lock)	assert_raw_spin_locked(&(lock)->rlock)
> +
> +#else  /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
> +# include <linux/spinlock_rt.h>
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
> +
>  /*
>   * Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
>   * task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPTION,
> @@ -480,12 +486,6 @@ static inline int rwlock_needbreak(rwlock_t *lock)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -#define assert_spin_locked(lock)	assert_raw_spin_locked(&(lock)->rlock)
> -
> -#else  /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
> -# include <linux/spinlock_rt.h>
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
> -
>  /*
>   * Pull the atomic_t declaration:
>   * (asm-mips/atomic.h needs above definitions)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


Nevermind, sent this one by mistake.