From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/mmu: Retry fault before acquiring mmu_lock if mapping is changing
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:38:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZalUDLVJSVN/rEf2@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240110012045.505046-1-seanjc@google.com>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:20:45PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Retry page faults without acquiring mmu_lock if the resolved gfn is covered
> by an active invalidation. Contending for mmu_lock is especially
> problematic on preemptible kernels as the mmu_notifier invalidation task
> will yield mmu_lock (see rwlock_needbreak()), delay the in-progress
Is it possible fault-in task avoids contending mmu_lock by using _trylock()?
Like:
while (!read_trylock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock))
cpu_relax();
if (is_page_fault_stale(vcpu, fault))
goto out_unlock;
r = kvm_tdp_mmu_map(vcpu, fault);
out_unlock:
read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock)
> invalidation, and ultimately increase the latency of resolving the page
> fault. And in the worst case scenario, yielding will be accompanied by a
> remote TLB flush, e.g. if the invalidation covers a large range of memory
> and vCPUs are accessing addresses that were already zapped.
This case covers all usage of mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(), is it? Should
we also consider vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr()?
Thanks,
Yilun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-10 1:20 Sean Christopherson
2024-01-11 2:11 ` Yan Zhao
2024-01-12 7:48 ` Yuan Yao
2024-01-12 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-18 16:38 ` Xu Yilun [this message]
2024-01-18 17:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-19 5:50 ` Xu Yilun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZalUDLVJSVN/rEf2@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050 \
--to=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®