From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>, Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Wang Ming <machel@vivo.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Subject: CONFIG_INET_{AH,ESP} say y if unsure - rationale?
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:46:00 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbipOApntQMw8q0S@archie.me> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1771 bytes --]
Hi,
I stumbled upon CONFIG_INET_AH and CONFIG_INET_ESP every time I configure
my custom kernels. Kconfig description of each options says:
> Support for IPsec AH (Authentication Header).
>
> AH can be used with various authentication algorithms. Besides
> enabling AH support itself, this option enables the generic
> implementations of the algorithms that RFC 8221 lists as MUST be
> implemented. If you need any other algorithms, you'll need to enable
> them in the crypto API. You should also enable accelerated
> implementations of any needed algorithms when available.
>
> If unsure, say Y.
> Support for IPsec ESP (Encapsulating Security Payload).
>
> ESP can be used with various encryption and authentication algorithms.
> Besides enabling ESP support itself, this option enables the generic
> implementations of the algorithms that RFC 8221 lists as MUST be
> implemented. If you need any other algorithms, you'll need to enable
> them in the crypto API. You should also enable accelerated
> implementations of any needed algorithms when available.
>
> If unsure, say Y.
Yet, distributions like Debian ([1]), Fedora ([2]), and Arch ([3]) instead
enable both options as module, but I followed the Kconfig recommendation
above.
I was wonder the rationale behind "say Y if unsure" for both
options, and whether `default Y` should be justified or not.
Thanks.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/raw/master/debian/config/config?ref_type=heads
[2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/raw/rawhide/f/kernel-x86_64-fedora.config
[3]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/linux/-/raw/main/config?ref_type=heads
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbipOApntQMw8q0S@archie.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=machel@vivo.com \
--cc=make_ruc2021@163.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=wangdeming@inspur.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®