From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
longman@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
niuzhiguo84@gmail.com, ke.wang@unisoc.com, xuewen.yan@unisoc.com,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:55:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbwTVPj7WU_Vu6D_@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f1691cd-fcc8-4a0b-9d63-bff15c5a52ad@acm.org>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 01:24:48PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2/1/24 11:48, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave():
> > lock_acquire():
> > __lock_acquire():
> > validate_chain():
> > lookup_chain_cache_add():
> > graph_lock();
> >
> > Basically, every lock acquisition may lock the lockdep graph because
> > of dependency checking.
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler to make __lock_acquire() return early if
> this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion) indicates that the graph lock is held?
>
Note that lockdep_recursion doesn't indicate graph lock is held, it
indicates we enter lockdep internal, which means if there was any lock
acquisition, __lock_acquire() would skip the check, so we don't go into
lockdep internal again, therefore avoid infinite recursion.
Regards,
Boqun
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 7:48 Zhiguo Niu
2024-01-17 14:58 ` Waiman Long
2024-01-17 20:53 ` Boqun Feng
2024-02-01 16:35 ` Carlos Llamas
2024-02-01 17:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-01 19:58 ` Boqun Feng
2024-02-01 20:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-01 21:53 ` Boqun Feng
2024-02-02 2:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-02 8:19 ` Zhiguo Niu
2024-02-01 19:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-01 19:48 ` Boqun Feng
2024-02-01 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-01 21:55 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbwTVPj7WU_Vu6D_@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ke.wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=niuzhiguo84@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome