On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 01:04:48PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: >Hi Michael, > >Quoting Michael Grzeschik (2024-02-06 21:30:17) >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:23:17AM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote: >> >On Tue, Feb 06, 2024, Michael Grzeschik wrote: >> >> Hi Thinh >> >> >> >> I found some strange situation while streaming via uvc-gadget to some >> >> usb host. It happens when some requests are missed due to higher load on >> >> the gadget machine. In some cases some requests will reach the host >> >> twice. In my special case, I added the following changes [1] for the >> >> host and gadget side. >> > >> >Does this only happen to some specific hosts? >> >> >Are all the data of the duplicate requests matching or just some bits of >> >the transfer? Were you able to confirm from some usb analyzer/sniffer >> >that the data out the wire is actually duplicate? >> >> Turns out, this duplicates are just misinterpretations. > >I'm glad there's no deeper issue to worry about here. > >> The linux uvcvideo driver will parse the uvc header payload twice. (If >> the FID was incremented inbetween). This led to those double misleading >> outputs. Although this means that there is a bug in >> uvc_video_stats_decode for incrementing the error count. > >Do you plan/are you able to submit a patch to fix this? Hopefully that >would prevent anyone else following the same rabbit-hole. Sure. For now I came up with this changes. This leaves the errorcounts in a sane range. However with this compiled kernel I saw some issues with the host machine to freeze up. I will just ensure that this is not caused by this particular patch. Regards, Michael diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c index 40eafe43d1888..b582698be7f00 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c @@ -1094,6 +1094,29 @@ static int uvc_video_decode_start(struct uvc_streaming *stream, uvc_video_stats_update(stream); } + /* + * Mark the buffer as done if we're at the beginning of a new frame. + * End of frame detection is better implemented by checking the EOF + * bit (FID bit toggling is delayed by one frame compared to the EOF + * bit), but some devices don't set the bit at end of frame (and the + * last payload can be lost anyway). We thus must check if the FID has + * been toggled. + * + * stream->last_fid is initialized to -1, so the first isochronous + * frame will never trigger an end of frame detection. + * + * Empty buffers (bytesused == 0) don't trigger end of frame detection + * as it doesn't make sense to return an empty buffer. This also + * avoids detecting end of frame conditions at FID toggling if the + * previous payload had the EOF bit set. + */ + if (fid != stream->last_fid && buf->bytesused != 0) { + uvc_dbg(stream->dev, FRAME, + "Frame complete (FID bit toggled)\n"); + buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_READY; + return -EAGAIN; + } + uvc_video_clock_decode(stream, buf, data, len); uvc_video_stats_decode(stream, data, len); @@ -1140,29 +1163,6 @@ static int uvc_video_decode_start(struct uvc_streaming *stream, buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_ACTIVE; } - /* - * Mark the buffer as done if we're at the beginning of a new frame. - * End of frame detection is better implemented by checking the EOF - * bit (FID bit toggling is delayed by one frame compared to the EOF - * bit), but some devices don't set the bit at end of frame (and the - * last payload can be lost anyway). We thus must check if the FID has - * been toggled. - * - * stream->last_fid is initialized to -1, so the first isochronous - * frame will never trigger an end of frame detection. - * - * Empty buffers (bytesused == 0) don't trigger end of frame detection - * as it doesn't make sense to return an empty buffer. This also - * avoids detecting end of frame conditions at FID toggling if the - * previous payload had the EOF bit set. - */ - if (fid != stream->last_fid && buf->bytesused != 0) { - uvc_dbg(stream->dev, FRAME, - "Frame complete (FID bit toggled)\n"); - buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_READY; - return -EAGAIN; - } - stream->last_fid = fid; return data[0]; -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |