From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, Mario.Limonciello@amd.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Ray.Huang@amd.com,
Borislav.Petkov@amd.com, Alexander.Deucher@amd.com,
Xinmei.Huang@amd.com, Xiaojian.Du@amd.com, Li.Meng@amd.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] cpufreq:amd-pstate: initialize nominal_freq of each cpudata
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:04:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcR1+kL8ShJdnK5B@BLR-5CG11610CF.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4fcf3b4c2b5abcf79bbaf9780fe67b4ec697dee.1707363758.git.perry.yuan@amd.com>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:46:30AM +0800, Perry Yuan wrote:
> Optimizes the process of retrieving the nominal frequency by utilizing
> 'cpudata->nominal_freq' instead of repeatedly accessing the cppc_acpi interface.
>
> To enhance efficiency and reduce the CPU load, shifted to using
> 'cpudata->nominal_freq'. It allows for the nominal frequency to be accessed
> directly from the cached data in 'cpudata' of each CPU.
> It will also slightly reduce the frequency change latency while using pstate
> driver passive mode.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index ac7faa98a450..ea8681ea3bad 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static int amd_get_max_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - nominal_freq = cppc_perf.nominal_freq;
> + nominal_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq);
Does it make sense to call cppc_get_perf_caps() in
amd_pstate_cpu_init() and amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init() and cache all the
relevant metrics such as highest_perf, lowest_perf,
lowest_nonlinear_perf, nominal_perf, nominal_freq, lowest_freq so that
subsequent calls to amd_get_max/min/lowest_nonlinear/nominal_freq()
can use these cached values instead of calling cppc_get_perf_caps()
again ?
Because even with this patch, we continue to call cppc_get_perf_caps()
in amd_get_max_freq(), amd_get_min_freq() and
amd_get_lowest_nonlinear_freq().
> nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
> max_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf);
>
> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int amd_get_lowest_nonlinear_freq(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - nominal_freq = cppc_perf.nominal_freq;
> + nominal_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq);
> nominal_perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf);
>
> lowest_nonlinear_perf = cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf;
> @@ -848,13 +848,14 @@ static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> goto free_cpudata1;
>
> min_freq = amd_get_min_freq(cpudata);
> - max_freq = amd_get_max_freq(cpudata);
> nominal_freq = amd_get_nominal_freq(cpudata);
> + cpudata->nominal_freq = nominal_freq;
> + max_freq = amd_get_max_freq(cpudata);
> lowest_nonlinear_freq = amd_get_lowest_nonlinear_freq(cpudata);
>
> - if (min_freq < 0 || max_freq < 0 || min_freq > max_freq) {
> - dev_err(dev, "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) value is incorrect\n",
> - min_freq, max_freq);
> + if (min_freq < 0 || max_freq < 0 || min_freq > max_freq || nominal_freq == 0) {
+1 for the "nominal_freq == 0" check. On CPPCv2, nominal_freq and
lowest_freq are not advertised. So nominal_freq will be 0. It is
better to fail here than failing later at the time of governor
initialization.
> + dev_err(dev, "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) or nominal_freq(%d) is incorrect\n",
> + min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto free_cpudata1;
> }
> @@ -893,7 +894,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> cpudata->min_freq = min_freq;
> cpudata->max_limit_freq = max_freq;
> cpudata->min_limit_freq = min_freq;
> - cpudata->nominal_freq = nominal_freq;
> cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq = lowest_nonlinear_freq;
>
> policy->driver_data = cpudata;
> @@ -1310,12 +1310,13 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> goto free_cpudata1;
>
> min_freq = amd_get_min_freq(cpudata);
> - max_freq = amd_get_max_freq(cpudata);
> nominal_freq = amd_get_nominal_freq(cpudata);
> + cpudata->nominal_freq = nominal_freq;
> + max_freq = amd_get_max_freq(cpudata);
> lowest_nonlinear_freq = amd_get_lowest_nonlinear_freq(cpudata);
> - if (min_freq < 0 || max_freq < 0 || min_freq > max_freq) {
> - dev_err(dev, "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) value is incorrect\n",
> - min_freq, max_freq);
> + if (min_freq < 0 || max_freq < 0 || min_freq > max_freq || nominal_freq == 0) {
Ditto.
> + dev_err(dev, "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) or nominal_freq(%d) is incorrect\n",
> + min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto free_cpudata1;
> }
> @@ -1328,7 +1329,6 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> /* Initial processor data capability frequencies */
> cpudata->max_freq = max_freq;
> cpudata->min_freq = min_freq;
> - cpudata->nominal_freq = nominal_freq;
> cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq = lowest_nonlinear_freq;
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 3:46 [PATCH v6 0/6] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 3:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] ACPI: CPPC: enable AMD CPPC V2 support for family 17h processors Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 5:55 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-03-05 12:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-08 3:46 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] cpufreq:amd-pstate: fix the nominal freq value set Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 6:07 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-03-11 9:58 ` Ugwekar, Dhananjay
2024-02-08 3:46 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] cpufreq:amd-pstate: initialize nominal_freq of each cpudata Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 6:34 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2024-02-08 3:46 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] cpufreq:amd-pstate: get pstate transition delay and latency value from ACPI tables Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 3:46 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] cppc_acpi: print error message if CPPC is unsupported Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 6:46 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-02-08 3:46 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] cpufreq:amd-pstate: add quirk for the pstate CPPC capabilities missing Perry Yuan
2024-02-08 9:53 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-02-08 10:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements Borislav Petkov
2024-02-08 23:09 ` Deucher, Alexander
2024-02-09 15:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-09 17:33 ` Deucher, Alexander
2024-02-09 17:41 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcR1+kL8ShJdnK5B@BLR-5CG11610CF.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Borislav.Petkov@amd.com \
--cc=Li.Meng@amd.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=Xiaojian.Du@amd.com \
--cc=Xinmei.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®