From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAEB32E630 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707487483; cv=none; b=cJl9ob0N930PR79bJZx0PpgMeK2zjQR+LybCjXqFWbzYAfkLcSS54w22TD+xy0R7WN10/Ma1iYAN8pUwc9lc+rdope7WXq6L+y3QvGpct8TEyQJNmndOTU1wr1l7A5vm8G3TP/fJuhm4fn2/9HWCXiRoWtxWN4x/RdjHhNkGzgc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707487483; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vwibz1UBzunx12UaIjzyxed9fPynUv8i4klDAWlf9Ow=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=L1OQI/h/x0zGnxfMCW9QTTXVzkcGUL0wExr7yAd8FS7Bv5sFUJI6HmASJs/bYZ7Rhim3DioEbZrQoBpJeXB1BZEs8+sKiJuUZF3MHIxVVJB5h/15l25idEvXgcRbSDsD/k8iZkF5pzXiSLUBNMwFT/+zvphsZa0duVmwbi9Y9BA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=BfeRV0ec; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="BfeRV0ec" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707487482; x=1739023482; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=vwibz1UBzunx12UaIjzyxed9fPynUv8i4klDAWlf9Ow=; b=BfeRV0eceV4GA6FvsU7lczUfU1mJmrFC4z48eFv0Fb8Jms5asfsGc026 kYmns0g22p7W2jUa9fOHorWwPtpeDCkHpJD8hCzoQasaowsnRKYAl8hsN MIcylxrHEic9OlQc9pqkLIfYB9II2bZimp5lneeNDJQRoK1udP4ZY7buP Fl+3H/hh+T/Fj/fRCOkUwrBzJmRuh2XKvwCZLM5PTnFfk515aKUVDF0MH o7c6iWUAKEok9naWUngAmTHQN8vDU7YVdTthU9caUSAQlxTaffTcKD1wZ kSA1b0iK2xO9AEgx2p+52i02BA5qljou7EHPns9Sq8dFQK2ZDUZfdAXqI A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="23911768" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,257,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="23911768" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 06:04:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="910717014" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,257,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="910717014" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 06:04:39 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rYRUa-00000003AOw-0R6p; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:04:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:04:35 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andi Shyti Cc: Lucas De Marchi , Yury Norov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks Message-ID: References: <20240208074521.577076-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> <20240208074521.577076-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:48:59PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:45:19PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: ... > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula > > Lucas' SoB should be at the bottom here. In any case, nice patch: And it's at the bottom (among SoB lines), there is no violation with Submitting Patches. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko