From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D37011CAB for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 00:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708129722; cv=none; b=LWRbC+RZNUSUyKrYp5l/rCfa7qSJK4qjvJsYriKbDetVad2S1JLmCEJAxSiDnXQJ9s4Ud2dB76OvZo0MmumdC5Azr7uCF+WbsBEr2GLjQ47PcAcF6JM/3asB7b1GrKuXEfb6cAoTc9o99Esz/+M+keYH4EpcG9kDg0AmFbRHAXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708129722; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R40QHWBwT3Y9mpARpyccgf8Kq8e1WntO9rP9mLvye4k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PKGj5uC4+oiaukQanmf0PIrKxUtpw4j5N7sWIgSNkqma3nk1dBh21YLvL43ev1DrMvVLyrT9NsyTF45XuWZh5KVarD0bBU1en5V89Zq9xYomyRSS/kD9nuJYeg2CepdLZqsawqO/MVuBnlmgtWqsYwJYPZdzsr13V3P33b6wY6Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ErEZfRI/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ErEZfRI/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708129720; x=1739665720; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=R40QHWBwT3Y9mpARpyccgf8Kq8e1WntO9rP9mLvye4k=; b=ErEZfRI/1bsOUui10sMRQEMJ0zQS9NaSROw+NoQqW2VlK7hd5iaTtCnB Sm4PJ+eFgRgJkFmBUKuSlfvku6PIb5gxBMkubAfvmyR+jVUh/9dL7t3Tw rkIpaG3Y5LSkcxrUF02MFAZmR3bCP9rJHHJWI2p5sqgGsl/0KSwx60Yzo Agh/QYSg6cg1Fu6IILB8nMDrcwdfNlA/FUypQCKqybyR6q9JviuE20sXl g4pscT/wAu84qvL75ijS0WWlGMTYMftGcBe6Dyvwl9j6A3IH9ziaYqnIU CcqIBERXfDeELhvsg/KYxIo4kW+6DSdKoXz9Nh4y012jZ5sDM3t56YCpr Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10986"; a="19696922" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,165,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="19696922" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2024 16:28:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,165,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="34771143" Received: from agluck-desk3.sc.intel.com (HELO agluck-desk3) ([172.25.222.74]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2024 16:28:38 -0800 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:28:36 -0800 From: Tony Luck To: James Morse Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu , Reinette Chatre , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Message-ID: References: <20240213184438.16675-1-james.morse@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240213184438.16675-1-james.morse@arm.com> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:44:14PM +0000, James Morse wrote: > Hello! > > It's been back and forth for whether this series should be rebased onto Tony's > SNC series. This version isn't, its based on tip/x86/cache. > (I have the rebased-and-tested versions if anyone needs them) In case James' patches go first, I took a crack at basing my SNC series on top of his patches (specifically the mpam/monitors_and_locking/v9 branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git). Result is here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux.git Branch: james_then_snc The end result of which ought to be pretty similar to the "rebased-and-tested" versions that James mentions above. -Tony