mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Allen <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	romain.perier@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] r8152: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:49:40 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zd9yNByiBMcPxWbU@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMdWSLVDaN_XFD6Ov-=6VrH4wyBz-0wq_L3EzgdsJ5zJi47qQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:33:40AM -0800, Allen wrote:
> > @@ -6971,7 +6972,7 @@ static int rtl8152_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> >                 goto out_unlock;
> >         }
> >         napi_enable(&tp->napi);
> > -       tasklet_enable(&tp->tx_tl);
> > +       enable_work(&tp->tx_work);
> 
>   I think we are missing queue_work() above, right?
> 
>    To avoid such situations, could we combine enable_work() + queue_work(),
> into a single API?

Here, the device is newly being opened and the work item is just disabled
from the init. So, it doesn't need queueing.

> Perhaps, something like:
> 
> static inline bool enable_and_queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> struct work_struct *work)
> {
>        if (enable_work(work))
>        {
>              queue_work(wq, work);
>              return true;
>        }
>        return false;
> }

That said, this may still be nice to have.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-28 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27 17:28 [PATCHSET v3 wq/6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: Preserve OFFQ bits in cancel[_sync] paths Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: Implement disable/enable for (delayed) work items Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: Remove WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: Remember whether a work item was on a BH workqueue Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: Allow cancel_work_sync() and disable_work() from atomic contexts on BH work items Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] r8152: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue Tejun Heo
2024-02-28 17:33   ` Allen
2024-02-28 17:49     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-02-28 18:00       ` Allen
2024-02-28 18:01         ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-28 10:00 ` [PATCHSET v3 wq/6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() Lai Jiangshan
2024-03-25 17:31   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zd9yNByiBMcPxWbU@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®