From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554E919474; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708677252; cv=none; b=YVT9CR/pCie/fpC8mIYgieQGm/AnyMtae4I4iyuKVAmJnTenBTdFCNaQhdgcMvGzt8WBmsIXvzSpJ5GbP53BaMUeK1cT7CFA2PaxElijocHiM26+RNQc/H5mSv9X/Fjcm8j/zPYa+WPZ7jyDXC+M2P5cS9OQduGbnGQsEKGor5M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708677252; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/lW7ZmoooOy9fLc7q9dtxDneE+FqEHXGAYdnAzZbiw4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=T2ae4CLH3edxoYwsWd+AW0s3Ufz/8mpZSaz8hARVI32AA/Vgdo7R5yViGoZWOjmcEE3yx10+08HpN81zFccwSn+vad7whF1xCc/Lhxk7T/GT5TQ3V9DC7J9lZS14Iy+Zfs8FJTyZ9u+lJ8zjSX3hGSn60xI1Sv99NxdN8AwD86I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E439C15DB; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 050E83F73F; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:34:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:33:55 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Linus Walleij Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Sudeep Holla , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Oleksii Moisieiev , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, AKASHI Takahiro , Peng Fan Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Message-ID: References: <20240223-pinctrl-scmi-v4-0-10eb5a379274@nxp.com> <20240223-pinctrl-scmi-v4-3-10eb5a379274@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:28:12AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:08 AM Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > > From: Oleksii Moisieiev > > > > Add basic implementation of the SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol. > > > > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi > > Tested-by: Cristian Marussi > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev > > Co-developed-by: Peng Fan > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > > This looks ripe for merging for me, there are clearly dependencies in the SCMI > firmware tree so I can't apply this to the pin control tree, but if > someone creates > an immutable branch from the SCMI firmware repo (based off v6.8-rc1 or so) > I'm happy to also pull the branch into pin control. > Well, AFAIK there is another upcoming change in the v3.2 SCMI spec and I am not sure if this series accounts for it...indeed the v3.2 -bet4 was still pending fr feedback AFAIK (and I doubt latest changes are in since they have been discussed like yesterday...)....but I maybe wrong, I will chase for the final spec and look into this to verify if it is compliant... Anyway, given the particularly long history of changes in PINCTRL v3.2 SCMI I would wait to have the final spec officially frozen at this point before merging.... Thanks, Cristian