From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378ACDDC9; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709810453; cv=none; b=eozbwsjx2xeQIWefuDohl2QNJzWX+ErvJbC821jfppXbMA+PL3DfUXWwgPE/DTY1HeASjCwQ3stu9gJNXdTAPHkmrOuAaZt674ctDT41MHgAoxgsicv8kUV3zLSxELTgpW28lGWVOBN3mRhDx9vPOTSivmkheLKrwAQkowtqz6Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709810453; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ApMkrw723LkwYTFRCtKAEXYBM0ar5qJTrIp2KwSQfpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Grn+xhpyMAgjA93SNl2vTkmMHGgGKZ59W0+CTveAgIy0PoMVJ9plGfGabFoZF1+XESGu8dHpDWm65O9m9wK12Xyvq4fofyzC2gH+Y//RNfrdlsy1A9Uyz41YLQTccsVoHsKUnIoW2mqqq5YzFJtbhTQFfryWQ5FoDot3m4L90OI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=SWWnLXiV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="SWWnLXiV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709810451; x=1741346451; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ApMkrw723LkwYTFRCtKAEXYBM0ar5qJTrIp2KwSQfpw=; b=SWWnLXiVRceJTo/YNx1/rMvEDJX7kAVRjhGmyGEAZh1MTYdBsc57IxKG 2+SzSVRVngT+7Kur1bc6yBLDTCMUFZhG0J8zfN5YaBt+MWlA5zp6zeEKS cHcPBCoxzGsDM64DMHuKpHEpysQ6/EIZIpinGET7Wd876VYPeY+Ez1CpA 1arCoHQfT3Z9LVVLxfqFGJJTs7woh0Rop3Quo6IreiZytCuqA3klJGWLz /8r/FLszJo6aDfaAVy98uBtcy3lcFWwOCdMdqv5oDPXGzB9u1fS55AKNR IWQtInBLNgL0uB84T++kXGlLSKJn0FVRKRhbfPHzcq8gedqaA0SeWjRm/ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11005"; a="15881501" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,211,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="15881501" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2024 03:20:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11005"; a="914211314" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,211,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914211314" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2024 03:20:49 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1riBnr-0000000AXdk-2q8W; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:20:47 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 13:20:47 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: Yang Yingliang , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: oc-tiny: Remove unused of_gpio.h Message-ID: References: <20240228193732.3605768-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <9ac09714-25e6-429f-8847-0ee6a34e0220@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ac09714-25e6-429f-8847-0ee6a34e0220@sirena.org.uk> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 05:10:22PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:42:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:37:31PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > of_gpio.h is deprecated and subject to remove. > > > The driver doesn't use it, simply remove the unused header. > > > Hmm... did it fall through cracks or anything should I do? > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. Right, but it looks like this is quite simple one that simply got unnoticed or so... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko