From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07BAD3F9C5; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710328475; cv=none; b=hKlgBuoc0lXBFpXLwruONpKNUQfhakw9a+uk0cQpGarXfdxlO8cMh9MR88qyZwGXHxkxFAIdqR06cK06wmPBAYYo4XRI3h+iNWkT6ANTcmCQBsVatsgF+7XfvUbFED3gSRAqOIhjxjeZIOLA2JUvW6z+XnNarxHcw4CtMPyJMVU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710328475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rjBWIoX7FUFBKjKqdMh9OVQTIYw1aLir8rSR4UM0APg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lSHC8EP8947lX//eB0EfBf4j27UpSAxNGVtuUB/f5TdN865o+KCi4mOA7FGKl2WxhA1cvQxvbkPv/jlqANqFXpXyg25Aq0vDRRyxyFPfjVMnT9C7eJAfu/BSaX2m+k2idWaZO7CepoDM0X7xiwU7srzyfX8NFlSqxCD4BhAZLV0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O+FjSmVX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O+FjSmVX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710328474; x=1741864474; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=rjBWIoX7FUFBKjKqdMh9OVQTIYw1aLir8rSR4UM0APg=; b=O+FjSmVXZAjPNpfNfb/LO9tL7dZii7cKbjTOjZvrDR4Gd6M6+lGpMMrW T6m81jQ5b+Sf3gXZUhIDSt6mrSEELEU+TSIOhnf4/PJgZ5SDBacNxwK8t NOOd9Gqq2qe/pIYYK5nl0UD75aF2zV7/7gjL1++CZH9D3sdVU1F56P8s2 8ANhds6VyqqF1tIntJVS90cP3cDHojoLCrXTeXJjPj2D48WCl+42IFEg9 l17nUwKtKqoPgnMxOfufmSDZjJvyMjVoAteA4268JdLE3I/CFT+9dzICN D4mtaqbhZck9tUX6XQbptoIP746MxKmAlfFk3vAbnj4c4hvqr9W/UmtzD A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11011"; a="16532504" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,122,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="16532504" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2024 04:14:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11011"; a="914429190" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,122,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914429190" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2024 04:14:29 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rkMZ0-0000000CCC4-378N; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:14:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:14:26 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: Get rid of gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array() Message-ID: References: <20240307135109.3778316-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:36:18PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:51 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > There are only two users left of the gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array(). > > Convert them to very basic legacy APIs (it requires much less work for > > now) and drop no more used gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array(). > > That's reasonable and makes the kernel a better place. > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Thank you! Bart, do you want me to take it via my tree or you want to take directly? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko