From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:55:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zfi4V1g8kvcgUx44@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65f8b263bd757_aa2229444@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
On 18.03.24 14:30:11, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > The CEDT contains similar entries as the SRAT. For diagnostic reasons
> > print the CEDT same style as the SRAT.
>
> I will defer to Rafael here, but with acpica-tools, cxl-cli, and
> /proc/iomem is there much value to adding this to the boot-up logs by
> default?
Compared to the number of SRAT printks there are just a few CEDT
entries. I have added it as CEDT and SRAT entries have the similar
effect to NUMA, so diagnostics should be at the same level.
Thanks,
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 21:08 [PATCH 0/3] ACPI/NUMA: SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates Robert Richter
2024-03-18 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup for CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-03-18 21:14 ` Robert Richter
2024-03-18 21:31 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-18 21:26 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-18 21:50 ` Robert Richter
2024-03-19 11:54 ` [PATCH] cxl: Fix use of phys_to_target_node() outside of init section Robert Richter
2024-03-20 0:21 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-21 12:09 ` Robert Richter
2024-03-18 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-03-18 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT) Robert Richter
2024-03-18 21:30 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-18 21:55 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2024-03-18 21:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI/NUMA: Remove architecture dependent remainings Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zfi4V1g8kvcgUx44@rric.localdomain \
--to=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®