From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3319F8F6F; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 22:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712011578; cv=none; b=C6XIsO7gr/9MKEBtKsZlYzCwC7G1mxTtILOSD12gIqQe3o1koSrD4nLGR1jKifpqj82DE3/C0SuKN7zoch8f0/8m5LAhqjuxlska3AicOtyGQFg1HwoUYUmmMjW05AC10+zly1yqbwpPUvolSl4Tovo16Dos48h/vXMotXVrGA4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712011578; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MrqDEBWd02lqgWk3/WZxrIvL1NUSLhf9sen0+aK8Ep0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IT2d8nVBChFJWQZq3EpnnK6A1AEsXu7nUDuZ0Frv4dzbKeXDLnsBPjmYw8epusWrnRYAPep51xVeKql8SZUqQAwt1ztQgR1KiGhNMwPCZy/2IF1/kD5R1akWpMHGplArRuwyp3UapiXJuUxPes82dZo0v2oZx7JFGqE04B/0vNE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FdxgnI/E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FdxgnI/E" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F33AC433C7; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 22:46:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712011577; bh=MrqDEBWd02lqgWk3/WZxrIvL1NUSLhf9sen0+aK8Ep0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FdxgnI/EQRF3OkVOJr2BV1d7PO40Xjsp4dc8yFm0TUzacg4wjaCpfL7NVYcBnB4iz FP7pvQ8R0XgZ5X9weu/oNu6Jjv3q+lvZwBW80U5lwYBcNbksKHzFihO4WGlLihApqg B0FcQBVAHvnblnIGaA6CEmNRBNPtIXRJQXg5oBDfqA4avqvIC15ksG4Iy5C3GfKyb2 yDZaKeIIrbDyDbA2Ca1g5xdeaCejIojWmCQVIC4T7/jk9cICF3KTZwhOfwtBc3ZX7S 78SDurcdLp6+k7ur4/OkmNdORIsdTb9/sNCL0JO7Eu0mR10hZSVmMr/xXEjAZmOhb8 bX26Ipp+ELbUA== Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 00:46:15 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: kernel test robot Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [linus:master] [timers] 7ee9887703: stress-ng.uprobe.ops_per_sec -17.1% regression Message-ID: References: <202403271623.f0b40181-oliver.sang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <202403271623.f0b40181-oliver.sang@intel.com> Le Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:39:17PM +0800, kernel test robot a écrit : > > > Hello, > > > we reported > "[tip:timers/core] [timers] 7ee9887703: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -1.2% regression" > in > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202403011511.24defbbd-oliver.sang@intel.com/ > > now we noticed this commit is in mainline and we captured further results. > > still include netperf results for complete. below details FYI. > > > kernel test robot noticed a -17.1% regression of stress-ng.uprobe.ops_per_sec > on: The good news is that I can reproduce. It has made me spot something already: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZgsynV536q1L17IS@pavilion.home/T/#m28c37a943fdbcbadf0332cf9c32c350c74c403b0 But that's not enough to fix the regression. Investigation continues... Thanks.