From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: "boy.wu" <boy.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: kasan: clear stale stack poison
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:36:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgvRmhbvVoGHcLqu@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231222022741.8223-1-boy.wu@mediatek.com>
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:27:41AM +0800, boy.wu wrote:
> From: Boy Wu <boy.wu@mediatek.com>
>
> We found below OOB crash:
>
> [ 33.452494] ==================================================================
> [ 33.453513] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec
> [ 33.454660] Write of size 164 at addr c1d03d30 by task swapper/0/0
> [ 33.455515]
> [ 33.455767] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 6.1.25-mainline #1
> [ 33.456880] Hardware name: Generic DT based system
> [ 33.457555] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c
> [ 33.458326] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c
> [ 33.459072] dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x158/0x4a4
> [ 33.459863] print_report from kasan_report+0x9c/0x148
> [ 33.460616] kasan_report from kasan_check_range+0x94/0x1a0
> [ 33.461424] kasan_check_range from memset+0x20/0x3c
> [ 33.462157] memset from refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0xcc/0x2ec
> [ 33.463064] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0 from tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick+0x180/0x53c
> [ 33.464181] tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick from do_idle+0x264/0x354
> [ 33.465029] do_idle from cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x24
> [ 33.465769] cpu_startup_entry from rest_init+0xf0/0xf4
> [ 33.466528] rest_init from arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18
> [ 33.467397]
> [ 33.467644] The buggy address belongs to stack of task swapper/0/0
> [ 33.468493] and is located at offset 112 in frame:
> [ 33.469172] refresh_cpu_vm_stats.constprop.0+0x0/0x2ec
> [ 33.469917]
> [ 33.470165] This frame has 2 objects:
> [ 33.470696] [32, 76) 'global_zone_diff'
> [ 33.470729] [112, 276) 'global_node_diff'
> [ 33.471294]
> [ 33.472095] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> [ 33.472862] page:3cd72da8 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x41d03
> [ 33.473944] flags: 0x1000(reserved|zone=0)
> [ 33.474565] raw: 00001000 ed741470 ed741470 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001
> [ 33.475656] raw: 00000000
> [ 33.476050] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> [ 33.476816]
> [ 33.477061] Memory state around the buggy address:
> [ 33.477732] c1d03c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [ 33.478630] c1d03c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00
> [ 33.479526] >c1d03d00: 00 04 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
> [ 33.480415] ^
> [ 33.481195] c1d03d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3
> [ 33.482088] c1d03e00: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [ 33.482978] ==================================================================
>
> We find the root cause of this OOB is that arm does not clear stale stack
> poison in the case of cpuidle.
>
> This patch refer to arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S to resolve this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boy Wu <boy.wu@mediatek.com>
It looks like you're specifically referring to what arm64 did in commit:
0d97e6d8024c71cc ("arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison")
Where the commit message explained the problem:
| Functions which the compiler has instrumented for KASAN place poison on
| the stack shadow upon entry and remove this poison prior to returning.
|
| In the case of cpuidle, CPUs exit the kernel a number of levels deep in
| C code. Any instrumented functions on this critical path will leave
| portions of the stack shadow poisoned.
|
| If CPUs lose context and return to the kernel via a cold path, we
| restore a prior context saved in __cpu_suspend_enter are forgotten, and
| we never remove the poison they placed in the stack shadow area by
| functions calls between this and the actual exit of the kernel.
|
| Thus, (depending on stackframe layout) subsequent calls to instrumented
| functions may hit this stale poison, resulting in (spurious) KASAN
| splats to the console.
|
| To avoid this, clear any stale poison from the idle thread for a CPU
| prior to bringing a CPU online.
... which we then extended to check for CONFIG_KASAN_STACK in commit:
d56a9ef84bd0e1e8 ("kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK")
If you can fold in the description above (i.e. cite commit 0d97e6d8024c71cc and
a copy of its commit message):
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> index a86a1d4f3461..93afd1005b43 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ cpu_resume_after_mmu:
> instr_sync
> #endif
> bl cpu_init @ restore the und/abt/irq banked regs
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN) && defined(CONFIG_KASAN_STACK)
> + mov r0, sp
> + bl kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below
> +#endif
> mov r0, #0 @ return zero on success
> ldmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, pc}
> ENDPROC(cpu_resume_after_mmu)
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 2:27 boy.wu
2024-03-29 3:17 ` Boy Wu (吳勃誼)
2024-03-30 18:36 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-02 6:19 ` Boy Wu (吳勃誼)
2024-04-02 10:41 ` Linus Walleij
2024-04-02 9:36 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-04-02 9:48 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2024-04-02 10:32 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgvRmhbvVoGHcLqu@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=boy.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®