From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B439133421; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712083416; cv=none; b=mCqFFKAslruBrBzxIK4D6wempGRUuSPhNLlkSf146ESqgapon2Gz5t04LePEYeYi8oP5Rqn3syR8mCZPSPlEsELwWu+PErM6M23ROtYXzvXdKMjcayJAeK0nz7gPt24QC8UF+xmPLmc1HKg9OwU/1J9PI4Yo6pZMGUGMA2jzTGM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712083416; c=relaxed/simple; bh=owPkFS+aHIiODbc1mDCipIfoNGM2SZCNTgceRjbgtrY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SSfzrmYL2viMC/jhCeSx7CzKwAb8AHmU4vF9glCoSsj4OS1P0HXPQ+nssTOZhYW0LWWXbQBJGpkyZaWdt6CqMcC6Qm4WGqxhRzcoZWLp84QNG1A73RhlYfsgNtb/3G5CXQ0K5rPOWUduvsmSSKEH/zbxv5cave927ZGQjkWuXTM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=BjKmuVKr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="BjKmuVKr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712083415; x=1743619415; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=owPkFS+aHIiODbc1mDCipIfoNGM2SZCNTgceRjbgtrY=; b=BjKmuVKrNGeytW7VF7N0/QSbmpnb/spRQ0DaXPlbQQKoZIFQjEZdBKdx gB+d7TstebUvUICRs1CcwNEOicwcCbMMSV0U8hyK9UFymWqCMjEqSNW3s TPZTM2DN5q2nWDymcdpJZ3WOHPsvpGAIHeimDQ+7kf5tNBbMjjR52xWMI 6EOzcx6vFrJx4CraBTm7RskorAeOR9iECHQzucl4ENbeJiIK7il/QTgfW 51g+8+H97wVuzrO2I0YZunB+/oB0tQndHszd30zXqvq5UHeFs3zAFVqlD sths/7BZUER1iDqXT7NONrCUIZaWZ2xGI0tni9vPxOJBAEn78+ffr8MZ4 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5WkhkMCpQUyCIRLF0welQw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fkSW7xnVSkmaUny5jO1HQg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11032"; a="7146471" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,175,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7146471" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2024 11:43:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11032"; a="915150053" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,175,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="915150053" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2024 11:43:31 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rrj6W-00000000u3U-0fnL; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 21:43:28 +0300 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:43:27 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: Get rid of gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array() Message-ID: References: <20240307135109.3778316-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240307135109.3778316-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:49:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There are only two users left of the gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array(). > Convert them to very basic legacy APIs (it requires much less work for > now) and drop no more used gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array(). Any comments on this? We really want to get rid of the legacy APIs. While at here, would be also good to have a comment/tag for https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327193138.2385910-7-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko