mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: 周泰宇 <zhoutaiyu@kuaishou.com>,
	"josef@toxicpanda.com" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-throttle: fix repeat limit on bio with BIO_BPS_THROTTLED
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:39:37 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ziag2TL_BqmTRK5D@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbf135e8-de16-8eb4-9ade-1b979a335e33@huaweicloud.com>

Hello, Yu Kuai.

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:47:41AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> 在 2024/04/22 11:33, 周泰宇 写道:
> > What I want to do here was to set an easy to reach value to BPS_LIMIT (10M/s in this example) and an unable to reach value to IOPS_LIMIT (100000 in this example).
> > 
> > 
> > Under this setting, the iostat shows that the bps is far less than 10M/s and sometimes is far larger than 10M/s.
> 
> Yes, I know this behaviour, and this is because blk-throttle works
> before IO split, and io stats is accounting bps for rq-based disk after
> IO split, if you using Q2C for bps you'll see that bps is stable as
> limit.
>
> Hi, Tejun!
> 
> Do you think this *phenomenon* need to be fixed? If so, I don't see a
> easy way other than throttle bio after *IO split*. Perhaps ohter than
> bio merge case, this can be another motivation to move blk-throttle to
> rq_qos_throttle().

Yeah, blk-throtl is sitting too early in the pipeline to easily track how
the bios actually get issued. However, given that it's been available for
bio-based drivers for a really long time, I don't think it'd be a good idea
to move it, so iops limit is always going to be a bit unreliable w.r.t. what
actually get issued to the device. So, IMHO, if the oddity is just about how
IOs are counted, I don't think it's a critical problem on its own.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-19 12:07 zhoutaiyu
2024-04-20  1:48 ` Yu Kuai
2024-04-22  3:33   ` 周泰宇
2024-04-22  3:47     ` Yu Kuai
2024-04-22 17:39       ` tj [this message]
2024-04-23  1:50         ` Yu Kuai
2024-04-23  2:29           ` 周泰宇
2024-04-22  9:42     ` Yu Kuai
2024-04-22 13:05       ` 周泰宇

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ziag2TL_BqmTRK5D@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhoutaiyu@kuaishou.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®