mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/nolibc: Add tests for strlcat() and strlcpy()
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:28:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zifhr1sX5soHlXSG@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172d25cf-cfd7-4069-8c26-df2e81ffbad1@t-8ch.de>

Hi Thomas,

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:18:06AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> + Shuah and Paul, please see below.
> 
> So I picked this up and it got picked up by Shuah, but...
> 
> On 2024-02-18 16:51:06+0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > I've verified that the tests matches libbsd's strlcat()/strlcpy()
> > implementation.
> > 
> > Please note that as strlcat()/strlcpy() are not part of the libc, the
> > tests are only compiled when using nolibc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > index 6ba4f8275ac4..d373fc14706c 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > @@ -600,6 +600,25 @@ int expect_strne(const char *expr, int llen, const char *cmp)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define EXPECT_STRBUFEQ(cond, expr, buf, val, cmp)				\
> > +	do { if (!(cond)) result(llen, SKIPPED); else ret += expect_str_buf_eq(expr, buf, val, llen, cmp); } while (0)
> > +
> > +static __attribute__((unused))
> > +int expect_str_buf_eq(size_t expr, const char *buf, size_t val, int llen, const char *cmp)
> > +{
> > +	llen += printf(" = %lu <%s> ", expr, buf);
> 
> This introduces a compiler warning on 32bit:
> 
>     i386-linux-gcc -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c89 -W -Wall -Wextra -fno-stack-protector -m32 -mstack-protector-guard=global -fstack-protector-all  -o nolibc-test \
>       -nostdlib -nostdinc -static -Isysroot/i386/include nolibc-test.c nolibc-test-linkage.c -lgcc
>     nolibc-test.c: In function 'expect_str_buf_eq':
>     nolibc-test.c:610:30: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=format=]
>       610 |         llen += printf(" = %lu <%s> ", expr, buf);
>           |                            ~~^         ~~~~
>           |                              |         |
>           |                              |         size_t {aka unsigned int}
>           |                              long unsigned int
>           |                            %u
> 
> 
> It is easy enough to fix through a cast to "unsigned long".

Yes, that's usually what I do as well with size_t everywhere as well.

> The original patch was already sent to Shuah and included in -next.
> 
> Shuah, Paul:
> 
> I'd like to rewrite the offending commit instead of having a fixup commit.
> As it seems to me the original patch would only go into 6.10 anyways.
> 
> Any objections?

I, too, think it would be the cleanest history-wise, I just don't know
if that's the easiest for Shuah if it requires to change already published
commit IDs.

> Notes to self:
> 
> * Add flag to run-tests.sh to use -Werror
> * Implement "%zu" in nolibc printf()

Could be nice indeed!

Thanks Thomas for taking care of this!
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-23 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-18 19:51 [PATCH v3 0/4] Misc fixes for strlcpy() and strlcat() Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-18 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] tools/nolibc/string: export strlen() Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-18 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] tools/nolibc: Fix strlcat() return code and size usage Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-18 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] tools/nolibc: Fix strlcpy() " Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-18 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/nolibc: Add tests for strlcat() and strlcpy() Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-18 20:39   ` Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-18 21:11     ` Willy Tarreau
2024-02-18 21:41       ` Rodrigo Campos
2024-04-23  9:18   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 16:28     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2024-04-23 19:49       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-04-26 16:43     ` Rodrigo Campos
2024-02-19 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Misc fixes for strlcpy() and strlcat() Willy Tarreau
2024-02-20 19:25   ` Rodrigo Campos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zifhr1sX5soHlXSG@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®