From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: quic_zijuhu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Cc: Tim Jiang <quic_tjiang@quicinc.com>,
Janaki Ramaiah Thota <quic_janathot@quicinc.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: QCA NVM file for the X13s (WCN6855)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 16:13:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjOfdK41yLwkH25T@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1b45d7d-27e0-4ad7-976c-670a0e0d136b@quicinc.com>
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:46:38PM +0800, quic_zijuhu wrote:
> On 5/2/2024 9:25 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:56:12PM +0800, quic_zijuhu wrote:
> >> On 5/2/2024 6:57 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > It's WCN6855 but the Linux driver currently uses the firmware you pushed
> > for QCA2066.
> >
> >>> The current Linux driver is using the generic NVM file (hpnv21.bin) for
> >>> WCN6855, but connectivity is quite bad and I only get 2-3 meters of
> >>> range.
> >
> >>>> Switching to the board-specific NVM configuration (hpnv21b.b8c) that
> >> it seems hpnv21b.b8c is a wrong NVM name.
> >> is it hpnv21g.b8c?
> >
> hpnv21g.b8c is the right NVM for the machine.
Ok, thanks. I'll try to find some time to test with this one as well.
> > What is the difference between those two?
> i am afraid that i can't answer your question due to company CCI policy
I understand.
> > Exactly. It's a Lenovo machine that comes with Windows pre-installed and
> > we're working on enabling Linux on it with some help from Lenovo.
> >
> >> need customer to make a request for their requirements if the answer is
> >> yes for above question.
> >
> > Lenovo has made requests for X13s firmware from Qualcomm and pushed it
> > to linux-firmware [1], but they have not yet been able to get Qualcomm
> > to provide an NVM configuration file for Bluetooth (I think the problem
> > may be finding the right person to talk to inside Qualcomm).
> >
> > So I was hoping maybe you could help us with this since the difference
> > between 'hpnv21.bin' that you pushed to linux-firmware and what came
> > with Windows appears to be really small (e.g. just a few bytes).
> >
> let me try to find out the right person who will push this task at next
> monday.
> there are some other internal procedures before we can push BT firmware
> into linux-firmware.
Much appreciated, thank you.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 10:57 Johan Hovold
2024-05-02 12:56 ` quic_zijuhu
2024-05-02 13:25 ` Johan Hovold
2024-05-02 13:46 ` quic_zijuhu
2024-05-02 14:13 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-11-14 6:57 ` quic_zijuhu
2024-11-14 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
2024-11-14 8:39 ` quic_zijuhu
2024-11-15 9:08 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjOfdK41yLwkH25T@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_janathot@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tjiang@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®