From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] usb: typec: ucsi: rework glue driver interface
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:11:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnK86Zgkr6krdV9C@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hgqvyaziumpag5g5ajzupllvpwlz44scma6yu3drmtoqwcwav4@w366suy7c2eo>
Hi Dmitry,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:59:07PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:24:53AM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > The interface between UCSI and the glue driver is very low-level. It
> > allows reading the UCSI data from any offset (but in reality the UCSI
> > driver reads only VERSION, CCI an MESSAGE_IN data). All event handling
> > is to be done by the glue driver (which already resulted in several
> > similar-but-slightly different implementations). It leaves no place to
> > optimize the write-read-read sequence for the command execution (which
> > might be beneficial for some of the drivers), etc.
> >
> > The patchseries attempts to restructure the UCSI glue driver interface
> > in order to provide sensible operations instead of a low-level read /
> > write calls.
> >
> > If this approach is found to be acceptable, I plan to further rework the
> > command interface, moving reading CCI and MESSAGE_IN to the common
> > control code, which should simplify driver's implementation and remove
> > necessity to split quirks between sync_control and read_message_in e.g.
> > as implemented in the ucsi_ccg.c.
> >
> > Note, the series was tested only on the ucsi_glink platforms. Further
> > testing is appreciated.
>
> Gracious ping for the reviews / comments. My endgoal is to simplify the
> command submission interface, allowing us to handle odd commands in a
> single function rather than having the code split between sync_write()
> and notification handling.
I don't have any objections. Just rebase these and drop the RFC. The
patch 6/7 did not apply cleanly anymore on top of the two dependencies
you listed.
thanks,
--
heikki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-02 23:24 Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:24 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] usb: typec: ucsi: move ucsi_acknowledge() from ucsi_read_error() Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:24 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] usb: typec: ucsi: simplify command sending API Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:24 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] usb: typec: ucsi: split read operation Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:24 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] usb: typec: ucsi: rework command execution functions Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:24 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] usb: typec: ucsi: inline ucsi_read_message_in Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:24 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] usb: typec: ucsi: extract common code for command handling Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-02 23:25 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] usb: typec: ucsi: reorder operations in ucsi_run_command() Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-18 18:59 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] usb: typec: ucsi: rework glue driver interface Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-19 11:11 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnK86Zgkr6krdV9C@kuha.fi.intel.com \
--to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=nikita@trvn.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®