From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
schatzberg.dan@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
changwoo@igalia.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move struct balance_callback definition upward
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:05 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpBJPRf5lnXxccH6@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711011434.1421572-2-tj@kernel.org>
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:13:58PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Move struct balance_callback definition upward so that it's visible to
> class-specific rq struct definitions. This will be used to embed a struct
> balance_callback in struct scx_rq.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Unless there are objections, as this is really trivial, I'll apply it
together with other patches. Please holler if there are any concerns.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 1:13 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.11] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move struct balance_callback definition upward Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 21:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-07-11 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched_ext: Open-code task_linked_on_dsq() Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched_ext: Unpin and repin rq lock from balance_scx() Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 2:05 ` David Vernet
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: s/SCX_RQ_BALANCING/SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE/ and add SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches Tejun Heo
2024-07-11 2:05 ` David Vernet
2024-07-11 1:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched_ext/scx_qmap: Pick idle CPU for direct dispatch on !wakeup enqueues Tejun Heo
2024-07-12 18:22 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.11] sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-09 21:21 [PATCHSET " Tejun Heo
2024-07-09 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move struct balance_callback definition upward Tejun Heo
2024-07-10 18:53 ` David Vernet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZpBJPRf5lnXxccH6@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=schatzberg.dan@gmail.com \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®