From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: ov5675: Fix power on/off delay timings
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:47:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpTUF85TffLjKhZi@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240713-linux-next-ov5675-v3-1-527f5b985836@linaro.org>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 11:33:29PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The ov5675 specification says that the gap between XSHUTDN deassert and the
> first I2C transaction should be a minimum of 8192 XVCLK cycles.
>
> Right now we use a usleep_rage() that gives a sleep time of between about
> 430 and 860 microseconds.
>
> On the Lenovo X13s we have observed that in about 1/20 cases the current
> timing is too tight and we start transacting before the ov5675's reset
> cycle completes, leading to I2C bus transaction failures.
>
> The reset racing is sometimes triggered at initial chip probe but, more
> usually on a subsequent power-off/power-on cycle e.g.
>
> [ 71.451662] ov5675 24-0010: failed to write reg 0x0103. error = -5
> [ 71.451686] ov5675 24-0010: failed to set plls
>
> The current quiescence period we have is too tight. Instead of expressing
> the post reset delay in terms of the current XVCLK this patch converts the
> power-on and power-off delays to the maximum theoretical delay @ 6 MHz with
> an additional buffer.
>
> 1.365 milliseconds on the power-on path is 1.5 milliseconds with grace.
> 85.3 microseconds on the power-off path is 90 microseconds with grace.
>
> Fixes: 49d9ad719e89 ("media: ov5675: add device-tree support and support runtime PM")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
I haven't hit this issue, but the camera on the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s
still works with this patch so:
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-13 22:33 Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-07-15 7:47 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-07-15 12:47 ` Quentin Schulz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZpTUF85TffLjKhZi@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®