From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
leit@meta.com, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/apic: Add retry mechanism to add_pin_to_irq_node()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:28:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqjAVDBBdYSxbdPO@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871q3c855i.ffs@tglx>
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:44:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> I'm absolutely not convinced by this loop heuristic. That's just a bad
> >> hack.
> >
> > I will not disagree with you here, but I need to use this patch in order
> > to be able t keep the system not panicking and stable while fault
> > injecting slab errors and trying to reproduce a real bug in the network
> > stack.
>
> Something like the untested below should just work.
Thanks. I've tested in a Skylake machine and I haven't see the crash
running the same test for more than 2 hours.
Feel free to add the following, in case you submit it:
Tested-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
This is the machine details, if it is useful.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) D-2191A CPU @ 1.60GHz
PIC: Intel Corporation Sky Lake-E IOAPIC
> Thanks,
Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 14:06 Breno Leitao
2024-07-29 16:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-07-29 16:55 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-29 17:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-07-30 10:28 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2024-08-07 16:25 ` [tip: x86/apic] x86/ioapic: Handle allocation failures gracefully tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqjAVDBBdYSxbdPO@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=leit@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®