From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3907F364BC; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 21:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723065719; cv=none; b=HokbIkEsjZZFRkW0IRjERTSlPdBgfGkwUnP6sVnzXetO2noScDWtvnkOG+mJc+BtjzfW6hIwvqKN/rrs8baoBs6xxPnGbfnI3GstRtBFW4O5up2C2C3sLZpAESEbbmgzUS7rBgMSQiCKixVmC2wmXmfM46n+30XYUGkL4g5M4Kk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723065719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dq1+AV92i31+4oeKeLoCAinDWxNJUx71g/nSYf1wiqo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f7o+bkazJXWj55YoZElSltSUvpjMIcOc1fnVdY0LBWgyQzw4L2SvJHAox5TyC/37SDZOGyqsUSBDZ9o7nsgYp3+uf6Y8u/8UK4/uyA0IkRP3voCj2gtICJCoygKIdDBydYN3SQfB1MpdK2++IxtI7tC1wXoSxaQUud9RGxsitS0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NFxu8Hb1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NFxu8Hb1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1723065718; x=1754601718; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Dq1+AV92i31+4oeKeLoCAinDWxNJUx71g/nSYf1wiqo=; b=NFxu8Hb1+5p5jj3bz79LSDNIYAErrsCii5xwH2q/qpq7KoSTgutXMOiW fMNE+RH47lmGwaJp3waOE/Xm4OGHSdFP8sJu27koxrwpnxk3uUnG/hVPM ouMEtHHLzPsjidjOv2lHrwBwmzSNY+4RG2AMjBRpLrBdwLp/4fhNc85Th yWiau2NLe0DR5JxbOjpEs1Yawe5LIhfQL36S7NE9xPpCQWWlNurUprNDW Yc2yIuNfboD4g9eTU9BWMp3KJw7nfrQJkJbfMdN0j0SJU0GwdYhvS+XY4 gW8wLQ8WKXZkV59pLCJbtbskQrZ5/eQOunt2T11LupetC48jETVpSSUwJ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: c5BoWpXmTaWdefejmtAHEg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5CcD4M7QTJqIpYyeV6wWJQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11157"; a="21285331" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,271,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="21285331" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2024 14:21:57 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5nV0nHCrQNqcrggwMFCChg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SnpUb/X8QU65IyoY1zD1rA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,271,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="56946448" Received: from dneilan-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.245.245.42]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2024 14:21:52 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 22:21:48 +0100 From: Andi Shyti To: Ma Ke Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, tursulin@ursulin.net, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix NULL ptr deref in intel_async_flip_check_uapi() Message-ID: References: <20240806092249.2407555-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240806092249.2407555-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> Hi Ma, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index c2c388212e2e..9dd7b5985d57 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -6115,7 +6115,7 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_uapi(struct intel_atomic_state *state, > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state)) { > + if (new_crtc_state && intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state)) { new_crtc_state is used also earlier. If it was NULL you wouldn't have reached this state. Have you experienced a null pointer dereference or is it some code analyzer that reported this? Can you explain how intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state() can return NULL? For now this is nacked. Thanks, Andi