From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EF0143723 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 10:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723113338; cv=none; b=Pj2jEo/2u+rjOGtpSMde0IFeHbQDaXwTnrCEB306rN8dGXgrdnAShMJJJftSyTsa4Ze6V9oEntiKLV3r9g7ADkcl8kQqaj3cNtCvUirVLzhMz87ehocKd/ZbT8Tm1FVb2TST86jd7EFDNqIb19LAjGW0E5rIR1FMxt5YkGIpLQc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723113338; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P5WkWuMuBZYslRPDaGbmL4Xir3nJ3nC4NhpsZuTy/BE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P+WgcFfQftegh7nrc1xBq5RoOy7LUkkS8qOMKtyLjtSJbKz1Xd8FleDa7jpRiZqEuv8xoyvOqPlG7KZ2JGN6YeqNu8VgNsESA+jyeLeCCuGt6fwhIbA5sEYDyqkIVDxX6Or5eS6n4g5/HRogXd4snpGGUYvX9jvgYve5IJDy1hI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hlDx4VNx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hlDx4VNx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1723113337; x=1754649337; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=P5WkWuMuBZYslRPDaGbmL4Xir3nJ3nC4NhpsZuTy/BE=; b=hlDx4VNxAwcCDQB1Lx2nZEEC0cXFCO4zK1m55WqoHdRejXa+ufQeP/O5 Me+3LTlD4ZCawuqNosWmhQuxnOxEfmMLuvwsrfIfWeGSCyzdbE4YZsgD1 wngmSFhWBC57Y/53PCMH+wdvCypkXa/RD6p8oQh9Z3CbvsIuc8nD7q4aq TXQd5vbgYUPIHK5jRXrIxz13DCzSiZssURZwhgMjpjEoYcff7EJsA0LeP sM3Ij4yROuqRjltx7u4oX+BPDZ/Bledqq3VsdyRQLCkH1nm11icRzOFHB vvNLnMTVALg4mVmPO+/uMIAmk6PWQ75BfZV1jbQALDucVJR1XU/5swAgM Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ovydl2zMSmmNFPuqOOTjdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SkwXs0PoRSWJ/jGPLWCQtQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11157"; a="38686049" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,272,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="38686049" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2024 03:35:37 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s3wnOjv9ThyGUOLWHcX9Sg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: POL1YADgSwCsqBMS5jINtw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,272,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="57274416" Received: from dneilan-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.245.245.71]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2024 03:35:30 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:35:23 +0100 From: Andi Shyti To: Luca Ceresoli Cc: Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Thomas Petazzoni , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: use dev_err_probe when failing to get panel bridge Message-ID: References: <20240808-ti-sn65dsi83-dev_err_probe-v1-1-72417aa275ab@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240808-ti-sn65dsi83-dev_err_probe-v1-1-72417aa275ab@bootlin.com> Hi Luca, On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:26:14PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > When devm_drm_of_get_bridge() fails, the probe fails silently. Use > dev_err_probe() instead to log an error or report the deferral reason, > whichever is applicable. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c > index 57a7ed13f996..60b9f14d769a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model) > > panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 2, 0); > if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge)) > - return PTR_ERR(panel_bridge); > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(panel_bridge), "Failed to get panel bridge\n"); patch looks good, but the message is a bit misleading. You are not failing to get the panel bridge, but you are failing to find a panel bridge in a DT node. Right? Andi