From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB1B1A3BD0; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724857903; cv=none; b=Wtu6nfaQ5mvVZjT5HPY1EnBOzQkN/ox7MiHmZjIM9o3gR9kwVyjELZAAIrekgtOX6H1jwglA7Fn/MD4h8hTj3nGjIUg2dJX48DWz40ZhZgrV5mfICGo3Oy4b8rJ7bdFMGM3BYI8or2whwi9w5ON5vTSBrWPl/e6hD6t48BkiweE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724857903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5YJPyU93FZIqQ3QHkGoylE4Fc+ccIKPNGyZgM50RjXw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cfYrE7hQ0bc5FJNvrKfaUTDx51TLX2YWcl+xsHFbOUKLHkS8EaaltJJAL0nrfYVSLjatJsaCjVvQHvK+tqs2m+qzuR3o8esLv3rXvOapVG3oMystSq6+Nmdqb8+RiV69vg0yqC58HbKl4xki5g/nhNDAl/jaJ5n2RsnlSx2vv1Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VlXAWp/h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VlXAWp/h" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724857902; x=1756393902; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5YJPyU93FZIqQ3QHkGoylE4Fc+ccIKPNGyZgM50RjXw=; b=VlXAWp/hRZeg7VSm2ha+kw9MzXIjOKodLHjeoF1vpm43jq08FXIvJsdI 6R3feUE6dFZL557G2kfJMv3o/o03pfIEhEo1Nox3GxpMuKab+bGp+oCgl sjYoqmBsUql7s+wT58rw7AaVsBmNP0+QzvTpiZPfMRPeaiK9of6Bio/7Y 6n0VgXZLk/9pe3PQlnG1VvkW5o0vTDD0E3v7suQCszGgwnB7As6GIE9yP vk+bmHghhhg5EB7sVh4fX45mzXj0m0RWYV71vI4EvMchY7G3QbJR7uQqI Drb5bs/bSVo/VSGXrIUj7KJjLQTQ5bxak0w02ECm5weN6a6dn/KDdRRhs w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: K2obO4k0QGuEHl9bAjkhpg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BDXpQwj3Tk+gaGnWOikpEw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11178"; a="23200976" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,183,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="23200976" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Aug 2024 08:11:41 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GJ2FmotUT3i99/ZNkEtC6Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2fokvfrRQ5KhwzXOcKAFmA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,183,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="63246069" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Aug 2024 08:11:38 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sjKKd-00000002gZH-28Fd; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:11:35 +0300 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:11:35 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hartley Sweeten , Alexander Sverdlin , Russell King , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] gpiolib:legacy: Kill GPIOF_DIR_* and GPIOF_INIT_* Message-ID: References: <20240828142554.2424189-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240828142554.2424189-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 05:23:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Shrink the legacy API and definition surface by killing the (internal) > definitions. This, in particular, will fix a couple of drivers that took > it wrong. > > This is assumed to go via BPIOLIB tree as this is quite small series and > most of the changes related to it. Hmm... LKP complained that it can't apply them on top of Linux Next, however I don't see any issues as my branch based on next-20240828. Tell me if I need to resend. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko