mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, dongml2@chinatelecom.cn,
	amcohen@nvidia.com, gnault@redhat.com, bpoirier@nvidia.com,
	b.galvani@gmail.com, razor@blackwall.org, petrm@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: vxlan: add skb drop reasons to vxlan_rcv()
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:26:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsSLj-fI5Hiy9aV-@shredder.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240815124302.982711-7-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 08:42:58PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> index e971c4785962..9a61f04bb95d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> @@ -1668,6 +1668,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
>  /* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
>  static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +	enum skb_drop_reason reason = pskb_may_pull_reason(skb, VXLAN_HLEN);
>  	struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
>  	struct vxlan_dev *vxlan;
>  	struct vxlan_sock *vs;
> @@ -1681,7 +1682,7 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	int nh;
>  
>  	/* Need UDP and VXLAN header to be present */
> -	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, VXLAN_HLEN))
> +	if (reason != SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET)
>  		goto drop;
>  
>  	unparsed = *vxlan_hdr(skb);
> @@ -1690,6 +1691,7 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		netdev_dbg(skb->dev, "invalid vxlan flags=%#x vni=%#x\n",
>  			   ntohl(vxlan_hdr(skb)->vx_flags),
>  			   ntohl(vxlan_hdr(skb)->vx_vni));
> +		reason = (u32)VXLAN_DROP_FLAGS;

I don't find "FLAGS" very descriptive. AFAICT the reason is used in
these two cases:

1. "I flag" is not set
2. The reserved fields are not zero

Maybe call it VXLAN_DROP_INVALID_HDR ?

And I agree with the comment about documenting these drop reasons like
in include/net/dropreason-core.h

>  		/* Return non vxlan pkt */
>  		goto drop;
>  	}
> @@ -1703,8 +1705,10 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	vni = vxlan_vni(vxlan_hdr(skb)->vx_vni);
>  
>  	vxlan = vxlan_vs_find_vni(vs, skb->dev->ifindex, vni, &vninode);
> -	if (!vxlan)
> +	if (!vxlan) {
> +		reason = (u32)VXLAN_DROP_VNI;

Same comment here. Maybe VXLAN_DROP_VNI_NOT_FOUND ?

>  		goto drop;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* For backwards compatibility, only allow reserved fields to be
>  	 * used by VXLAN extensions if explicitly requested.
> @@ -1717,12 +1721,16 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (__iptunnel_pull_header(skb, VXLAN_HLEN, protocol, raw_proto,
> -				   !net_eq(vxlan->net, dev_net(vxlan->dev))))
> +				   !net_eq(vxlan->net, dev_net(vxlan->dev)))) {
> +		reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOMEM;
>  		goto drop;
> +	}
>  
> -	if (vs->flags & VXLAN_F_REMCSUM_RX)
> -		if (unlikely(!vxlan_remcsum(&unparsed, skb, vs->flags)))
> +	if (vs->flags & VXLAN_F_REMCSUM_RX) {
> +		reason = vxlan_remcsum(&unparsed, skb, vs->flags);
> +		if (unlikely(reason != SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET))
>  			goto drop;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (vxlan_collect_metadata(vs)) {
>  		IP_TUNNEL_DECLARE_FLAGS(flags) = { };
> @@ -1732,8 +1740,10 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		tun_dst = udp_tun_rx_dst(skb, vxlan_get_sk_family(vs), flags,
>  					 key32_to_tunnel_id(vni), sizeof(*md));
>  
> -		if (!tun_dst)
> +		if (!tun_dst) {
> +			reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOMEM;
>  			goto drop;
> +		}
>  
>  		md = ip_tunnel_info_opts(&tun_dst->u.tun_info);
>  
> @@ -1757,12 +1767,15 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		 * is more robust and provides a little more security in
>  		 * adding extensions to VXLAN.
>  		 */
> +		reason = (u32)VXLAN_DROP_FLAGS;
>  		goto drop;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!raw_proto) {
> -		if (!vxlan_set_mac(vxlan, vs, skb, vni))
> +		if (!vxlan_set_mac(vxlan, vs, skb, vni)) {
> +			reason = (u32)VXLAN_DROP_MAC;

The function drops the packet for various reasons:

1. Source MAC is equal to the VXLAN device's MAC
2. Source MAC is invalid (all zeroes or multicast)
3. Trying to migrate a static entry or one pointing to a nexthop

They are all quite obscure so it might be fine to fold them under the
same reason, but I can't find a descriptive name.

If you split 1-2 to one reason and 3 to another, then they can become
VXLAN_DROP_INVALID_SMAC and VXLAN_DROP_ENTRY_EXISTS

>  			goto drop;
> +		}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-20 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 12:42 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: vxlan: add skb drop reasons support Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: vxlan: add vxlan to the drop reason subsystem Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: skb: add SKB_DR_RESET Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:24   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 12:55     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: skb: introduce pskb_network_may_pull_reason() Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net: ip: introduce pskb_inet_may_pull_reason() Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: vxlan: make vxlan_remcsum() return skb drop reasons Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: vxlan: add skb drop reasons to vxlan_rcv() Menglong Dong
2024-08-17  2:22   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-17 11:33     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-19 22:59       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21 12:51         ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:26   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-08-21 12:54     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net: vxlan: use vxlan_kfree_skb() in vxlan_xmit() Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:28   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 12:57     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:43 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net: vxlan: add drop reasons support to vxlan_xmit_one() Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:33   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 13:02     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:43 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net: vxlan: use kfree_skb_reason in vxlan_encap_bypass Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:43 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: vxlan: use vxlan_kfree_skb in encap_bypass_if_local Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsSLj-fI5Hiy9aV-@shredder.mtl.com \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=b.galvani@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®