From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5360413634C; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724936807; cv=none; b=DNrM06L6yWqxo47HgHXSl/9xV/ip7Mmv5/1myz3I5YPLYlPOCouu+FWQ/PfXt7nIvWjUdKxJm5MMQDTktBUXDTdwji4AzSNib2duKw+v6jFS1d/Zlho0DJpqH/K/pRD+L/9pmZQcVSggGVH+AEN2sGkyRnEN86PHsN+6UV/FsO8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724936807; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xB0LBGqlJ52aBrcdBnczCdjyguxfZpNBrvU61Gt4yCg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Xc6EptBeeY9G+ryns/I2xD23gpR38HczN+59lNiuFktB1oc2XajiNBKCt9LHcmhEy26rqxmlFtOubzVLqtrND/ePgsDiJO518M9wEWWe1h8q7vdSVFECw0jzBwzxhad7OzmTPc8vNU7L07sm8bJ9VPzzHgppk/+1ujmYtEsgkgw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=d+yqaTmR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="d+yqaTmR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724936806; x=1756472806; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xB0LBGqlJ52aBrcdBnczCdjyguxfZpNBrvU61Gt4yCg=; b=d+yqaTmRLBHEl+XvGQFiK1LLk45ykHCrV2CxoHzfsSKhl5JOD1HaPxms 96PBS6WHjvPtl/7QKNKjBYBxPBrBpJkdkgKqrveccJkV6sSb6+ISNUL3Z PbjotF3m7VTi0tJ/U7R0Oki0oedvHX+OxVKJlmLQoi0g+mf+ENQnZzAil 8IH1xr5HPUC4pipunYCdqixIObaj3A7YQUF6h1XZNOXzUTYq6kYm7JRKy PqjCpOflOFAraFhdUXcJRMn0dk4kbQ5Ou0NraXT8iK/+B6tQGtco3IEB7 zLzzd5V2on4IOqK9+VE88p/y+4BJKM+xngAoYvqC/HubNxnG6xTaLY6l0 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Fp2s0bIGRCuKVnGD8zS7qA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EaOnhFK7THKS9S1JWxsSYQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11179"; a="41028398" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,185,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="41028398" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2024 06:06:45 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: elcsTg68QYys47l41cX07Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: o8L8lHO7QhKysbX9+bWEsg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,185,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="68235663" Received: from turnipsi.fi.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.237.72.44]) by fmviesa004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2024 06:06:43 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D825E11F843; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:06:40 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:06:40 +0000 From: Sakari Ailus To: Benjamin Bara Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Hans de Goede , Laurent Pinchart , Alexander Stein , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Bara Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] media: i2c: imx290: check for availability in probe() Message-ID: References: <20240828-imx290-avail-v2-0-bd320ac8e8fa@skidata.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240828-imx290-avail-v2-0-bd320ac8e8fa@skidata.com> Hi Benjamin, On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Benjamin Bara wrote: > Hi! > > This series introduces i2c communication with the imx290 sensor during > probe s.t. the v4l2 subdev is not initialized when the chip is not > reachable. > > The datasheets show that INCKSEL* registers have a different default > value after reset on imx290[1] and imx327[2], however I am not sure if > this is a sufficient identification option - therefore I just removed > the current CHIP_ID register for now. It seems your Sob line and From: do not match. Could you fix that, please? The patches are otherwise here . -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus