From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76011176AC5; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726847195; cv=none; b=Spr6DRVo3kF7BB4CBM6G2b4dyTTbtqGMkZWRH0TJ/VDqo14lICrkCvc2SmUkJSsy0HgC2yWTMCwgrTfkr07SBKCvXFA6rdZkSLGbXpyhOgJEHnma2je0Y+GtJByUR2M9lTSu515ieBOgmFpRezE+731AYVYhWPk/Arm5l0xhrKI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726847195; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Engf6z76qpKlNEPMOZLUg9FwBGasCOqP5Xndi5tcOEQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DIVQV1nwFBtrUFUERjAeTGzaXtUiLgdZB0bzxm3FfuveHv8ixI83nZdeqLT0+Ts9RLuPAw8TqxTzLGPyg3O6zph5t/Fj/DDO9wm59HQpkRJ+BhxTKFV27Ytzdfp3E8ra4dMbFvNIZpv7etVi9cCm/cdMypyf4yTL5Rff1bH60NQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VrRHAjAW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VrRHAjAW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726847194; x=1758383194; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Engf6z76qpKlNEPMOZLUg9FwBGasCOqP5Xndi5tcOEQ=; b=VrRHAjAW8zWrvXjOgl6EX27UXSxOiOGoami2xqQoHP/Jrnf1nmFezq2o 5Dt0/c/0V2ZGOelhKkX2eadH5ehJ3nWd9jUwX9jXwMfadiOP0mISpv6dD VAk1Ti0lMmMrkWrwHV15R7TFEYpYy5ql+xc6JgapGOkF8F6S0tkJe4m0U U5x8JGC74hvjgAqCgPNSFn2l3fEQdNk+bK81pfEkQKto0Ho/X2MzfznJG 74zaRg3nyclPejeam4oivMsb3Q4kXOrdd6E+nXTeO68LiOxTa8/1U2/VD fR7zHMdGt1gkIIKeYaHPqO+gvn7/tJTn3V7q6UHkj37m0kvDCyCVCoJap w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W6L/cyJSRtaD7G1bRoc0gw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hOnh+V0uTnCK5iPQIF4Pow== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11201"; a="26006032" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,244,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="26006032" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Sep 2024 08:46:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VwO/chKUTpu5flE5yDl3JQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8R1P82BVQV6VIc9RNhayAg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,244,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="70345991" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Sep 2024 08:46:31 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1srfq0-0000000Axm7-3G6Z; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:46:28 +0300 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:46:28 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Parker Newman Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Parker Newman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] serial: 8250_exar: Replace custom EEPROM read with eeprom_93cx6 Message-ID: References: <87719d2113970b6ff4979329fb96346a0aca9775.1726838531.git.pnewman@connecttech.com> <20240920114221.57da8890@SWDEV2.connecttech.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240920114221.57da8890@SWDEV2.connecttech.local> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 11:42:21AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:26:08 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > I will fix in v3. In this case should I drop your Reviewed-by tag? > Or is this change small enough to keep it? I'm glad you asked. As you rightfully noted, this one is small, no need to drop tag. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko