Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: fix firmware crash for AP DFS mode

[Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 02:22:09AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 5:33 PM
> > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@nxp.com>; l.stach@pengutronix.de
> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > briannorris@chromium.org; kvalo@kernel.org; francesco@dolcini.it; Pete
> > Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@nxp.com>
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: fix firmware crash for AP DFS mode
> > 
> > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> > opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> > this email' button
> > 
> > 
> > +Lucas (in case he missed this patch)
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 04:07:19PM +0800, David Lin wrote:
> > > Firmware crashes when AP works on a DFS channel and radar detection
> > occurs.
> > > This patch fixes the issue, also add "fake_radar_detect" entry to
> > > mimic radar detection for testing purpose.
> > 
> > Do we want such kind of "fake" code in the driver?
> > 
> > I do not agree that we mix an actual bug fix with additional testing code, and if
> > I understand correctly the commit message this is what we are doing here.
> > 
> 
> This file can be used to test this patch on other chips without really radar
> detection from HW.

please move the fake test code to a separate patch so that it can be discussed
separetely from the actual fix

> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11h.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11h.c

...

> > > +
> > > +     if (priv->uap_stop_tx) {
> > > +             if (!netif_carrier_ok(priv->netdev))
> > 
> > is this if needed? why? can't you just call netif_carrier_on() in every case?
> 
> If netif_carrier_ok(), there is no need to call netif_carrier_on().

yes, ok. this I know. But it seems not needed, and one line less of code is
better than having one additional useless line of code.

My question is, is it required to have it? for what reason? My undestanding
is that you should just remove it, but maybe I am missing something.

> > > +                     netif_carrier_on(priv->netdev);
> > 
> > 
> > > +             mwifiex_wake_up_net_dev_queue(priv->netdev, adapter);
> > > +             priv->uap_stop_tx = false;
> > > +     }
> > >  }