From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6004D186E2C; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726219940; cv=none; b=MNQYsjH5nylVG6P9arPva/aCVyafk6V1NZCqJmeDAjSW6J3//JZTFw8UlHVnoUzVQ9CPz+GPN2JFYYKV0YoSYvo6i6FE9aGL/GaDwmJiDFy3U+maJnsEHhqgo7oRInyuvbC5FbOY+YFhScF4IzPrUXiI/TUNTfbkOIw1mvhLsuE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726219940; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9irAKzGFtUS0xzWAeFO68FCPUTDILQHTPta0d82KoaU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uKxZmjoe9IvtsF+tokfNRH+jg5j0/Kpnt/hq3RvvIcuNZ27wt9d1Qz3RAovLJ+tkj4aL8+VNX/NBZgV0/TQztkB56MtKeuO4S3C88qNu8xyEWZpK4cnVRJJ3h3a2NBNieeUixwnEPhigfLjYJiR7ea4F9XixxouOZY0HkRl1x10= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Exlarc59; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Exlarc59" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726219939; x=1757755939; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9irAKzGFtUS0xzWAeFO68FCPUTDILQHTPta0d82KoaU=; b=Exlarc595NHbNExeYvb3NlcQIj44gKOd69BdStTkEXl58QXUrSd4vr93 LlSCfb0KzDRuL3wQVClQiSzjnsH2V5yj0LSgo+mf5wOH3moA4CtkqMhXi 9w/iMwbtzh5J5zX9DvUIg28ZJgmx8kbI6I5amnkEepdNjGZ12cd5hfwjv zZeJ099ah+0LeHehB3/xwrrONrApJRkWR5Oq23GVbjp+q0IVy8zYCe1wX VxcFVAD4nyQmKytEy9AB5XSeW2y/U4WiWhzQJQD3BzsCxV+KF6AAbOwjP zw7XqUdvXmKO57RQfQlXVBZrK4lO2HtyuC0Vc6f1uwYojKrRsNsJUN648 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +a4061cbS4ue9NTCKdg78A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Z4UJ8sdlSJeh0U372dYLNQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11193"; a="25265211" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,225,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="25265211" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2024 02:32:19 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +Byo6285QdGWZNHF2EuUyQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: sy5Gb5NuTRydgBezJA4f2A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,225,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="72099006" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2024 02:32:17 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sp2f0-00000008FBN-41kh; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:32:14 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:32:14 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hans de Goede Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: imu: kmx61: Drop most likely fake ACPI ID Message-ID: References: <20240911213110.2893562-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <2b847413-f8ee-436c-a635-f5a36253e953@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2b847413-f8ee-436c-a635-f5a36253e953@redhat.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:52:34PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/11/24 11:31 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The commit in question does not proove that ACPI ID exists. > > Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doint that > > for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI ID. > > > > Googling for KMX61021L gives no useful results in regard to DSDT. > > Moreover, the official vendor ID in the registry for Kionix is KIOX. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > Thanks, patch looks good to me: Same Q here. > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede And thank you for the reviews! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko