From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A676B19CD1B for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727101177; cv=none; b=CeRtKH7Oc0805Lxu0RmOTx9SqrqSS2lFp+lnuvNTasPWWZ8u8bknx8OG0at4yxyLq6v4+NTImImiSNuMHUvJ9Axo6/GV28ayH00RMwNHxZWLVL3orh+FDKG+L/LcTAFDM+UvhO32gqsSETnqS/+Hr7OarmbYsrOYAEO135lxqic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727101177; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SFgrI4olngEkBpWsmcuVB37o8iX9U8HhunyWS7uFIBc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IE2NQKYFTzDRiAxH1K6DLYlwo6Ax06h5k4PmfpVfVrcpO1s9nLquqOQajhQwUj8IcvEmYbMAFFxLx1cByoWlC9Fa2OcDMJM8/+eCpxhSTJJFhj9Aqcl374FS1FyuKJlifBSortiPAbDJESEdVQ8uWBJcFKa8y5p12E2kAKpmdYE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Fae5vt/k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Fae5vt/k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CC33C4CEC4; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:19:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1727101177; bh=SFgrI4olngEkBpWsmcuVB37o8iX9U8HhunyWS7uFIBc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Fae5vt/ksJ2GXeCd49ZAgLuCXPu1fjht6SxVpgM6Qm6qRx5kA2QXZtLGKhtwZFWzs COAQSzgiSTPQmbDtpnkppPaNeNWNkBargXPMUBlBYD+6+SQA2fQFr9rJFi2iBpF1zr T0hgSwkO2plXuEYAgWj/U0B7SORQA5byHGIbm8yQmr/y2r3N/M+JDa/xhPSQp2mJjH c8+6XNo/JVulerroVQ3ihTXvhGecvnkK5DjN+X/zVkhXZGfLhGipISdPF118KDbWVs gai+4L5I/vLiR85zaEqJIdnEaDjEkZ60pLo+CGjyY7Dh9e78SjjnLxZrjDZ8Vgg1Bh Mby5oBwG7CJgQ== Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:19:32 +0200 From: Mark Brown To: Jerome Brunet Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: do not ignore provided init_data Message-ID: References: <20240920-regulator-ignored-data-v1-1-7ea4abfe1b0a@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5bDXW9jFwRojPsBD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240920-regulator-ignored-data-v1-1-7ea4abfe1b0a@baylibre.com> X-Cookie: Editing is a rewording activity. --5bDXW9jFwRojPsBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 07:21:12PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > Note that it is probably not problem at the moment since no one complained > about ignored data. I'm fine with tweaking the functionality here but since I don't think we're using this at all we should probably warn about systems with both forms of constraints specified since they probably need some consideration needed and people might not be doing this intentionally. That probably means checking if regulator_of_get_init_node() can find something and warning if that's the case. --5bDXW9jFwRojPsBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmbxePMACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DDwgf+MgFeHhmXWj1l8ZBsWeEGvaVY/rlWtw6RoUzGcv+COycfmxa40CQO5BUD Zr5TWIMZlioOSG2wmA+BocZ1Yft2Kj/rGD8mNbiAf3OfOM/RZ/Varme0MP5GhzuU 6jlsI4sh9yihBSgZPeXixNs2GrtORlSynaANtNfT/0Dgte74hen8NOI4JiKLhqA3 mg0ykv6J3grcSQSnIaEKB2v3bZt5pDufnP1RD0zIbYUsR3w3YuqAdjRyBo9new/C Hm/9U4RJbMHRuozQMv8Psl+aVHR2rRAon/2H6b83SZlswoJLovKaVzXh+w/QqSIb DUtfIp+slH+73UVxoP0DsyDzEGxv/g== =meRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5bDXW9jFwRojPsBD--